Memorandum from Mr Mike Newman
I am an amateur astronomer who is troubled by
light pollution and I have some comments for your committee.
1. THE PRESENT
STATE OF
AFFAIRS
In spite of previous attempts to limit the damage
caused by light pollution to the visibility of the stars and planets
in the night sky, the situation continues to deteriorate. Whereas
around 55 years ago when I was a child, the Milky Way was visible
at night, even in a suburb of Bristol (three miles from the centre),
I am now completely unable to see it from my back garden even
with binoculars. Other faint stars are also now invisible. Clearly,
the previous attempts to halt the deterioration have failed.
2. LIGHT POLLUTION
AND THE
LAW
By far the most important change needed is to
make intrusive light a nuisance in law in the same way that smoke,
fumes, smell and noise are at present. If offenders know that
it will be very difficult for objectors to obtain satisfaction
in the courts, their behaviour is likely to become increasingly
extreme as technology makes abuse easy and inexpensive and as
commercial motives push towards inappropriate use of lighting.
All other issues such as local planning issues
are crippled by the lack of a route through the courts as an ultimate
resource.
3. ILE GUIDANCE
NOTES
The Guidance Notes for the reduction of Light
Pollution (2000) produced by the Institution of Lighting Engineers
is an important step towards limiting light pollution. However,
the upwards Sky Glow is framed in terms of a maximum percentage
instead of an absolute limit in Lux. Although this imposes a stronger
limit than previously, there is no limit imposed on the total
light emission upwards, and so even if these guidance notes are
conformed with, as every new installation is created (Floodlit
sports grounds seem to be in constant demand) the amount of Sky
Glow will increase without limit until the stars are all invisible.
The only way to avoid this is to decide what
is the maximum sky glow which can be tolerated, and then cap the
upwards light emission in each area appropriately. Also, owners
of older installations which do not limit their Sky Glow suitably,
should be forced to replace the older lights with modern lights
which are properly designed for full vertical cut-off.
4 April 2003
|