Memorandum from the International Dark-Sky
Association (IDA), submitted by Dr David L Crawford
As a founder member and director of the International
Dark-Sky Association (IDA), which has 10,000 members worldwide,
I am writing to the Science and Technology Committee on behalf
of all our members resident in the United Kingdom, and for the
interest of all of our other members worldwide. The Committee
has invited submissions from interested parties on the subject
of "light pollution and astronomy", with particular
reference to the following specific questions:
1. What has been the impact of light
pollution on UK astronomy?
2. Are current planning guidelines strong
enough to protect against light pollution?
3. Are planning guidelines being applied
and enforced effectively?
4. Is light measurable in such a way
as to make legally enforceable regulatory controls feasible?
5. Are further controls on the design
of lighting necessary?
The International Dark-Sky Association is the
world's largest body pursuing the interests of all those who wish
to preserve the beauty of the environment above. The starry night
sky is threatened nowadays by wasted light as it has never been
threatened before. The dark sky is of special scientific interest
and it needs greater protection than that currently afforded to
it by the legal and planning structures in the UK.
Environmentally sensitive lighting, that is,
lighting which is of an appropriate brightness for the task, and
falls only where and when it is needed, is certainly quite possible,
and of much greater general benefit to everyone than uncontrolled
and over-bright lighting. A survey by the British Astronomical
Association (BAA), carried out in 1990, concluded that more than
90% of the people of Britain experience sky glow to some degree.
Professional astronomy has long ago deserted
light-polluted countries to darker places such as Hawaii, Chile,
and the Canary Islands; but of equal concern is the fact that
the ordinary observer, whether or not one is an amateur astronomer,
is robbed of the sight of the starry sky, a sight which has motivated
and inspired the human race for millions of years. In astronomy,
amateurs contribute much to original research.
Whether they are denied the stars because of
sky glow or by direct light trespass from unregulated exterior
lamp shining directly into their premises, would-be observers
of the heavens and the general public, including students, should
have some protection from such intrusion, and some redress if
it occurs.
Current planning guidelines in the UK, according
to members of our UK counterpart organisation, the BAA Campaign
for Dark Skies, lack the power of enforcement on existing and
small-scale schemes, and there is little that local administration
officers can do about complaints from victims of sky glow and
light intrusion. These people should not have to seek redress
in courts of law, and spend large amounts doing so, to retrieve
the tranquillity of the natural night. Light pollution should
be included in the law of nuisance, and in the Control of Pollution
Act as a potential pollutant, as it so often is today.
In all the locales in the USA and other countries
where light pollution control has been an issue, it has been found
easy to measure these adverse effects, by standard methods, so
that regulatory controls are feasible. We know it works.
Controls on the design of lighting are certainly
necessary. Leaving aside the question of the visibility of the
starry sky, the waste and environmental damage which lamps such
as globes and sideways-facing types cause cannot be tolerated
in a world where energy considerations are looming ever-larger,
and in countries which have signed up to international protocols
and agreements on sustainability and energy conservation.
Given these facts, the IDA urges the Parliamentary
Select Committee to think long and hard in their deliberations
about the damage wrought by ill directed and over-bright lights.
May they indicate to Parliament a positive direction for lighting
which illuminates without damaging the environmental and without
blighting lives.
25 February 2003
|