Annex
CURRENT STATUS
OF THE
NORMAN LOCKYER
OBSERVATORY
1. The Norman Lockyer Observatory is situated
one mile east of the coastal town of Sidmouth in East Devon and
close to a south facing cliff-top on the "World Heritage
Coast". It enjoys a relatively dark night sky with a southerly
aspect across the sea. The observatory is about twelve miles from
Exeter and ten miles from the M5 motorway.
2. The facility is a public access optical
observatory maintaining some of the nation's most historic instruments,
but it also provides modern telescopes with computer enhanced
imaging. The Norman Lockyer Observatory Society is a registered
charity (1048807) and holds the observatory under the terms of
a lease from the East Devon District Council. The Society's principal
charitable activities are the promotion of the "Public Understanding
of Science and Technology" and support for science education
in schools and universities. The preservation and improvement
of the observatory's operating environment are important factors
in its future success.
3. Sir Norman Lockyer built the observatory
as a private venture in 1912 following closure of the South Kensington
Observatory. It came under the control of the University of Exeter
between 1946 and 1987 when it was used mainly for non-astronomical
research projects. By the 1980s the observatory was almost derelict,
but since its rescue by the East Devon District Council in 1988
it has developed steadily. It is now trying to complete funding
for a further major expansion to cope with growing public interest.
4. There are few comparable public facilities
in Britain that provide both a planetarium and a working optical
observatory. The Times (Weekend 10 March 2001) listed the
Norman Lockyer Observatory with the Greenwich Royal Observatory,
the Edinburgh Royal Observatory, South Tyneside College, Jodrell
Bank Radio Observatory and the Armagh Observatory and Planetarium
as public access observatories in Britain. However, the Mills
Observatory (Dundee) and the refurbished telescope at the Herstmonceux
Science Centre should also be considered. Of these, we believe
that only the Norman Lockyer and Armagh observatories are situated
away from large cities.
5. There are many other smaller observatories
operated by local astronomical societies for their members, but
which occasionally make their facilities available to a wider
public. A number of universities operate observatories in Britain
for educational purposes. Some of these enjoy a relatively dark
sky.
6. The Norman Lockyer Observatory is not
funded by national or local government agencies nor receives on-going
grants from any organisation. The Society has no endowments and
needs to earn enough to maintain its instruments and pursue its
charitable aims. In this respect it is similar to most astronomical
societies in Britain, but is, perhaps, unique among the comparable
larger observatories listed above.
7. The renowned research history of the
Norman Lockyer Observatory lies in the analysis of star spectra.
Its historic instruments are associated with Lockyer's pioneering
work on star temperatures, which led to theories of stellar evolution
and the foundation of the science of astrophysics. Spectral work
on the heavens requires a clear sky without light pollution over
the whole optical spectrum. The Observatory co-operates with undergraduate
courses of Exeter, Plymouth and the Open Universities, and is
available to any university for development projects.
LIGHT POLLUTION
8. The Observatory supports the "Campaign
for Dark Skies" and is grateful for the work of the British
Astronomical Association on its behalf.
9. The Norman Lockyer Observatory enjoys
a relatively "clean" sky to the east and south across
the sea. The atmosphere is usually free of chemical pollutants
and, as the sea has a uniform temperature, the air is also free
of rising currents that can distort optical images. However, the
western sky is badly affected by light pollution caused by street
lighting at Exeter. The expansion of this city, particularly the
proposed new town at Broadclyst in East Devon, is a major concern.
The Observatory suffers problems in the north from lighting in
the Sidford area (one mile) and at Honiton (eight miles), which
makes it difficult to use long exposure photography or conduct
spectral work in this direction. However, it was possible to see
and photograph a recent aurora. Aurora are almost unknown to most
city dwellers and are very rarely seen from the South of England.
10. Broad-spectrum high-pressure sodium
lanterns, used for lighting main roads, and white mercury streetlights,
normally fitted in residential streets, produce most of the light
pollution. Older lanterns are badly designed and are often badly
aligned. Although the Observatory is able to remove the narrow
lines of pure sodium light using optical filters, broadband light
pollution makes work on the spectral content of starlight difficult.
11. An accelerated programme of streetlight
replacement with modern lanterns, in which lamps are wholly recessed
above the horizontal rim of the reflective shield, and also a
requirement to fit these in all new housing developments would
improve the local sky. The Observatory is grateful to lighting
authorities for the recent replacement of street lamps along the
A3052 at Clyst St Mary and Sidford.
12. Floodlit sports facilities, such as
at schools in Exmouth, Ottery St Mary and Colyton, where lamps
are tilted to project light forwards rather than down, seem difficult
to correct without further compelling guidelines. The problem
could be easily improved by adjusting lanterns so that all the
light is directed downwards on to the playing area. Probably fewer
lanterns could have been used with savings in cost and energy.
Short of retrospective legislation to enforce correct adjustment,
the slow drip of public education and persuasion seems our only
hope of solution. The effect these maladjusted lights have on
the vision of passing motorists also needs consideration if only
on grounds of road safety. Floodlighting of buildings by ground
sited lamps is a minor contribution to local light pollution around
this Observatory.
ENERGY SAVING
13. The most pressing reason for a national
programme to enforce good lighting practice is the saving in energy
it could produce. Generating capacity might be reduced with consequent
reduction of other pollutants. The Observatory is unable to provide
detailed figures, but it believes claims by others that most existing
outdoor lights shine up to 30% of their light energy directly
into the sky. The predicted figure for energy saving needs independent
review by a competent research organisation, but the Observatory
believes that a high proportion of light energy now wasted could
be prevented by a programme that ensures:
1. The correct adjustment of existing lanterns.
2. A programme of external lantern replacement
on public buildings and floodlit areas with fittings that conform
to a limit of no more than two per cent upwards light emission
and powers to ensure that these are correctly aligned.
3. A requirement that all new external light
fittings sold for domestic use should conform to the 2% upward
light emission limit and that manufacturers and stockists should
provide clear and explicit fitting instructions.
4. An accelerated programme of older streetlight
replacement by energy efficient lanterns.
5. A recommended preference for low-pressure
sodium lamps on motorways, road junctions, railway marshalling
yards and similar places where full colour perception is unnecessary.
6. The earliest implementation of such programmes
near working optical astronomical observatories.
14. The programme would permit use of fewer
lanterns overall and/or lower power lamps and bring about a reduction
of the UK's need for electricity generating capacity. These measures
would help the UK to meet its reduction targets for dependence
on fossil fuels. The improvement of the environment, including
the enjoyment of the heavens, would be a valued outcome for all
and British astronomers would also benefit.
3 March 2003
|