A wider public health role for
the maternity services?
192. In April 1999 the Prime Minister launched Making
a Difference: the nursing, midwifery and health contribution,
which outlined the Department's proposals to expand the role of
the midwife to include more involvement with women's health and
with public health in general. This expanded public health role
would accommodate support for breast feeding and smoking cessation,
and also early identification of women affected by domestic violence
or by postnatal depression.
193. Given the success of maternity services in some
areas, in terms of helping women to stop smoking and to initiate
and sustain breast feeding, proposals for a wider public health
role for midwifery staff constitute a recognition that maternity
services can act as a gateway to other services. The Centre for
Nursing and Midwifery Research at the University of Brighton argued
that midwives were crucial to the success of wider schemes to
tackle health inequalities:
The role of the midwife puts her in a unique position
since she often enjoys a greater level of acceptance by clients
than do other professionals such as health visitors and social
workers. Because of this, teams working directly, and holistically,
with disadvantaged clients have much to gain from incorporating
midwives.[174]
194. Jo Garcia from the NPEU explained how Maternity
services provided "a fantastic opportunity to reach women",
particularly those who might not otherwise use the health service
or who might have difficulty in gaining access to it:
if you are thinking about encouraging
[a woman]
to use child services, it may be
that if she has a good
experience with maternity care and feels she can trust the midwives
and the health visitors, then maybe for her, using child services,
knowing who to ask would be made easier.[175]
195. In fulfilling the wider public health role envisaged
for them, midwives need training to overcome negative attitudes
and prejudice, and support as they take on the challenge of caring
for women and families who are difficult to reach. The Maternity
Alliance suggested that training to improve access to services
for disadvantaged women and to promote their general health and
wellbeing, was not yet sufficient. Jenny McLeish told us that
for midwives:
The public health agenda is getting there, but it
has not really penetrated; it has not permeated their [the midwives']
culture. They do not have any time for reflective practice once
they are on the busy wards doing their work.[176]
196. Carolyn Roth from City University argued that
the proposed expansion in the public health role of maternity
services had not been recognised by service planners:
The demands on the midwifery service have increased.
It has absorbed an enormous amount of new things that we have
recognised that we need to do to respond appropriately to women's
needs and yet the service has not expanded to the same extent
and there is invariably more demand than the ability to respond
to it and women do suffer because of that.[177]
197. We recognise the potential
of midwives, and of maternity services, to play an expanded role
in promoting public health. However, maternity care staff must
have access to appropriate levels of training and support if they
are to be effective in this role. We recommend that the Department
should facilitate the implementation of the proposals in Making
a Difference by making a detailed assessment of the training
and support needs of staff who provide maternity care.
163 Ev 45 Back
164
Ev 4 Back
165
Ev 76 Back
166
Q 15 Back
167
Ibid. Back
168
Q 151 Back
169
"Protective effect of breastfeeding against infection",
P W Howie et al, British Medical Journal 300 (1990), pp
11-16 Back
170
Ev 73 Back
171
Ibid. Back
172
Ibid. Back
173
Q 15 Back
174
Ev 61 Back
175
Q 15 Back
176
Q 19 Back
177
Q 125 Back