Supplementary memorandum from the Department
for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Follow-up questions relating to oral evidence
given by the Rt Hon. Margaret Beckett MP to the House of Commons
Environmental Audit Committee on 12 February 2003
Q1. WHEN
DOES DEFRA
EXPECT TO
HAVE INCORPORATED
ITS WSSD COMMITMENTS
INTO ITS
OWN DELIVERY
PLANS? (ORAL
EVIDENCE Q251)
(a) How are other departments progressing
with this task? Have any already produced revised delivery plansif
so which ones?
(b) Has any cross-departmental deadline
been established for the revision of delivery plans to take account
of WSSD commitments?
Defra has lead responsiblity for six of the
main commitments arising from WSSDoceans, fisheries, agriculture,
biodiversity, chemicals and sustainable consumption and production
patterns (SCP). My officials are currently integrating our commitments
into the existing delivery plans, and where necessary establishing
new ones which I would expect to be integrated into the system
at the next spending review. The intention is to produce these
plans by July 2003.
I have agreement from colleagues across Whitehall
that they will, where necessary, translate WSSD commitments into
their delivery plans, and several departments are exploring the
possibility of establishing joint targets and delivery plans.
Although no cross departmental deadline has been established,
I expect to be able to announce further progress later this year.
Q2. CAN
YOU CONFIRM
THAT DEFRA
HAS NOT
IDENTIFIED ANY
SPECIFIC JOHANNESBURG
FOLLOW-UP
WORK RELATING
TO THE
WORK OF
DFES? (Q256)
Defra and DfES have not identified any follow-up
work as priorities in the "main commitments" for the
Government as outlined in the Annex to the Memorandum sent to
the Committee in February. However, the JPOI does contain some
commitments, predominantly on a UN Decade for Sustainable Development
Education.
The UK Government considers education critical
for promoting sustainable development. DfES is considering how
best to deliver the commitments at a national level. At WSSD we
agreed not only to take action at home, but also to encourage
improved access to education and support research, public awareness
programmes and developmental institutions in developing countries.
Action to take forward these agreements will be undertaken not
by DfES, but through the work of other Government departments
such as DFID and FCO.
The UK is also involved in a number of partnerships
to promote education, capacity building and participation in sustainable
development. For example, the CETISA (Centres of Excellence for
Technological Innovation and Sustainability in Southern Africa)
partnership, funded by the UK Government, brings together southern
and northern universities, governments and civil society groups
and aims to develop education and training in technology in Southern
Africa.
Further, through our participation in exchange
programmes, such as LEAD International, the UK Government actively
facilitates the sharing of expertise and promotes capacity building
with students, researchers and other experts from developing countries.
Q3. WHAT
KEY CHANGES
IN CURRENT
UN MACHINERY, PARTICULARLY
RELATING TO
UNEP AND THE
CSD, WILL THE
UK BE ADVOCATING
AT THE
UN CSD11 MEETING
AT THE
END OF
APRIL/EARLY
MAY? (QQ 203-204)
UK Government officials attended the eleventh
session of the Commission on Sustaninable Development in New York,
28 April-9 May. I took part in the High Level Ministerial Segment
(29-30 April). The UK, through the EU, pushed for reform of CSD,
so that it can more effectively review and monitor progress towards
sustainable development, catalyse the implementation of Agenda
21 and the Johannesburg Plan of Implementation and ensure that
corrective action is taken to overcome barriers.
In future CSD will organise itself into 2-year
action-orientated implementation cycles: the first "review"
year will look at progress on the (JPOI), concentrating on a series
of thematic clusters; and in the second "policy" year
CSD will consider what corrective action needs to be taken to
keep on track to meet the JPOI commitments. A seven cycle work
programme was agreed where the main topics in the thematic clusters
were as follows; water and sanitation; energy for sustainable
development; agriculture and rural development; sustainable consumption
and production; fragile ecosystems (forests, biodiversity etc);
oceans and fisheries; and an overall review of progress.
We were clear that CSD should remain a high-level
policy forum on sustainable development, with increased and active
participation of Ministers with a variety of portfolios. We also
worked hard to deliver the WSSD commitment on enhanced participation
of major groups and civil society in CSD.
We stressed the need for co-operation between
the CSD Bureau and the Bureaux of other functional commissions,
particularly ECOSOC, other UN Agencies and Programmes, including
UNEP and UNDP, as well as with UN Regional Commissions. CSD11
acknowledged the importance of integrated, coherent and effective
follow up of of the major UN conferences, building on the discussions
and recommendations arising from the Ad Hoc Working Group on Integrated
Conference Follow Up.
The UNEP work programme and funding were agreed
at the UNEP Governing Council in Nairobi in February, which UK
officials attended. Micheal Meacher headed the UK delegation.
Q4. WHAT
DISCUSSIONS, IF
ANY, HAS
DEFRA HAD
WITH THE
NATIONAL AUDIT
OFFICE (NAO) ABOUT
HOW UK PROGRESS
AGAINST WSSD COMMITMENTS
MIGHT BE
AUDITED AND
REVIEWED? (Q202)
[THE NAO HAS
AUTHORED A
DRAFT PAPER
ON SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT FOR
THE INTERNATIONAL
ORGANISATION OF
SUPREME AUDIT
INSTITUTIONS (INTOSAI)
WHICH IS
LIKELY TO
FORM THE
BASIS OF
GUIDANCE FOR
AUDIT INSTITUTIONS
AND HELP
TO IDENTIFY
CRITERIA AGAINST
WHICH PERFORMANCE
AGAINST THE
JOHANNESBURG PLAN
OF IMPLEMENTATION
MIGHT BE
ASSESSED.]
The UK Government's approach for delivering
and monitoring progress against WSSD commitments has been to work
to integrate our commitments into our delivery plans and, where
necessry, establish new ones. Reviewing, reporting, and being
held to account, on progress with the delivery of sustainable
development objectives and actions will continue to be part of
each relevant department's relations with the Treasury, the public,
and Parliament.
My officials are aware of the work on sustainable
development alreadly undertaken by the environmental auditing
working group of the International Organisation of Supreme Audit
Institutions (INTOSAI), of which the National Audit Office is
a member. The Group's current project work, initiated by the Office
of the Auditor General of Canada, the Chair of the Group, to take
forward this work and look at how performance against the Plan
of Implementation might be assessed, is at an early stage. My
officials will keep in touch with those in the National Audit
Office as this work develops.
Q5. HAS
THE TIME-LIMITED
TASK FORCE,
REFERRED TO
IN PARA
47 OF THE
DEFRA MEMORANDUM
TO THE
COMMITTEE, BEEN
ESTABLISHED? IF
NOT, WHEN
IS THIS
LIKELY TO
HAPPEN? (QQ218-223)
(a) Has its specific time-limited period
been agreed yet? If so, what is it?
The Sustainable Development Task Force was established
in April, and held its first meeting on 8 May. The Task Force
will hold two to four meetings a year until publication of the
revised sustainable development strategy, scheduled for 2005.
Q6. DOES
DEFRA STILL
EXPECT TO
PUBLISH A
CONSULTATION DOCUMENT
RELATING TO
THE UK PROGRAME
OF ACTION
ON SUSTAINABLE
PRODUCTION AND
CONSUMPTION (AS
REQUIRED BY
THE JOHANNESBURG
PLAN OF
IMPLEMENTATION)
IN SUMMER
2003? [FURTHER TO
THE DISCUSSION
OF QQ 292-299 AND
DEFRA SUPPLEMENTARY
MEMORANDUM].
(a) Has a cross-departmental working group
been established to prepare this? If not, how is cross-departmental
input being sought/co-ordinated?
Good progress has been made since February in
developing the UK strategy for sustainable consumption and production
and we continue to work towards a publication date of early Summer
2003. The role of stakeholders is an important element in this
work and my department continues to seek the views of a wide range
of interests, including those of other departments and the Devolved
Administrations. Input from external groups such as the Sustainable
Development Commission and the Government's advisory committees
ACBE and ACCPE is also being sought.
An Inter Departmental Steering Group, co-chaired
by Defra and DTI, was convened in late February to oversee the
development of the strategy; this group will meet on a regular
basis to monitor progress.
Following its publication, we envisage holding
a programme of events and dialogue on specific aspects of implementation
which will further inform the UK strategy.
May 2003
|