|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
30 Jan 2003 : Column 980Wcontinued
Mr. Bellingham: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how much the (a) Tube Lines and (b) Metronet consortia have spent on bid costs as part of their PPP bids for London Underground projects. 
Mr. Jamieson: The total costs of all of the bidders, successful and unsuccessful, are estimated to be around £270 million. As my reply of 13 January 2003 Official Report, column 398 W to the hon. Member for Tatton (Mr. Osborne) explained, the PPP amounts to modernisation of the entire underground network over the next 30-years. The level of bid costs reflects this and also the lengthy duration of the bidding process, which commenced in October 1999. Nonetheless, the level of bid costs represents only an extremely small proportion of the value of investment that will be delivered over the life of the contracts.
Norman Baker: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment he has made of the likely impact of the introduction of motorway tolls, other than on the M6, on (a) reduction of congestion and (b) encouragement of use of public transport. 
Mr. Jamieson holding answer 23 January 2003: The 'Background Analysis' published in July 2000 as part of the Ten Year Plan For Transport contained an illustrative scenario for charges on the trunk road network by 2010 at times and places where congestion was highest. That indicated an overall reduction of 9 per cent. in congestion compared with levels in 2000, though with variations between areas, including increases of congestion in some places. The effect on public transport was not calculated.
The Government's report on 'Modernising the Taxation of the Haulage Industry: Progress Report One' published in April 2002 reported analysis of a distance-based lorry road-user charge applying only to motorways, which suggested a reduction of lorry traffic of 25 per cent. on motorways but increases in congestion elsewhere.
30 Jan 2003 : Column 981W
Mr. Spellar: As with any other private company, Network Rail will publish accounts in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Acts. These will show the profit or loss for the relevant reporting period.
Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how much (a) his Department and (b) each agency and non-departmental public body sponsored by his Department spent on (i) publicity and (ii) advertising in each year from 199596 to 200203 (estimated); and if he will make a statement. 
Figures provided in these replies refer to expenditure by the Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (DTLR) and the Department for Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR). Breaking out the transport element for the years 1995/96 to 2000/01 could only be done at disproportionate cost.
For the current year, 2002/2003 the Department for Transport's estimated spend for publicity and advertising is £17.9 million of which approximately £10.6 million is currently allocated to advertising.
Gregory Barker: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what promotional and public information campaigns his Department is (a) running and (b) planning to run during the next six months; and for each campaign, (i) how much it will cost, (A) in total and (B) to his Department, (ii) what agencies or bodies are undertaking the work and (iii) what is its planned duration. 
30 Jan 2003 : Column 982W
Think! road safety:
My Department's main publicity campaign, where we intend over the next six/12 months to concentrate on messages covering child road safety, child restraints, teenage road safety, speed, seatbelts, fatigue, mobile phones, drink drive and motorcycle safety. Details of the Think! campaign calendar are regularly updated and can be viewed at www.thinkroadsafetv.gov.uk. The Think! advertising and publicity budget for 200304 should be just over £14 million, £6 million of which should be spent in the next six months.
Promotion of a public transport information service where expenditure of £570k is anticipated between December 2002 and July 2003 covering advertising in directories, merchandising material and posters/leaflets.
Publicity to raise awareness of the current national consultation on the future development of air transport in the United Kingdom. The latest consultation will run from February to May at an estimated cost of £260,000.
In developing these campaigns we use a range of external agencies to help take our campaign strategies forward. The creative work for the Think! campaign is currently provided by two advertising agenciesLeo Burnett and AMV with media planning/buying arranged through Carat. Two external agenciesQBO and Fishburn Hedges are also employed to extend campaign messages to lifestyle magazines and other media; while on traveline, Grasshopper have been employed to secure wider promotional opportunities.
In addition the Department uses a range of companies on frameworks covering research, design, typesetting, paper and print, and storage/distribution. Details of fees paid to each company are commercial in confidence.
Mr. Spellar: To date, total costs incurred are £49.5 million. Under the Railway Administration Order Rules 2001, the administrators intend to apply the High Court to seek approval for their fees and expenses. Network Rail will then reimburse the Department for Transport for those costs that were properly an expense of the administration. Only when the High Court has made a decision on the application will the total costs of administration be known.
Mr. Peter Ainsworth: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport from which organisations and corporate entities he has received representations on the South East and East of England Regional Air Services study and future airport policy in the South East, since 30 November 2002. 
30 Jan 2003 : Column 983W
Mr. Jamieson: The following information lists responses to "The Future Development of Air Transport in the United Kingdom (South East)" received from the main organisations and corporate entities dated 30 November 2002 or later. It includes responses submitted both in hard and electronic copy, but does not include responses to the NOP questionnaire.
Ashford Borough Council
Air Transport Action Group
Babergh District Council
British Airline Pilots Association
Chartered Institute of Purchasing And Supply
Colchester Borough Council
Council for Travel and Tourism
Crawley Borough Council
East of England Local Government Conference
East of England Development Agency
English, Welsh and Scottish Railway
Essex County Council
Freedom to Fly Coalition
Friends of the EarthWest London
Hillingdon London Borough
Institute of Logistics and Transport
Kent Thameside Association
Levett-Therivel Sustain Ability Consultants
Local Authorities Aircraft Noise Council
London City Airport
London Forum of Amenity and Civic Societies
National Air Traffic Service
Norwich City Council
Oneworld Global Airline Alliance
Redhill Aerodrome Ltd.
Royal Borough of Chelsea and Kensington
Stop Stansted Expansion
The Sevenoaks Society
Thames GatewaySouth Essex
Tring Town Council
Wildlife and Countryside Link
30 Jan 2003 : Column 984W
All responses to the consultation will be considered and analysed carefully before final decisions are taken. These will be set out in an air transport White Paper, which we aim to publish towards the end of the year.
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|