APPENDIX 33
Correspondence received from retailers
The Sub-committee received a number of letters
from individual retailers which we have decided not to print in
full, but which we have reported to the House. This appendix includes
extracts from those letters germane to the Sub-committee's inquiry.
From L A and C A Rourke, Hollingworth, Cheshire.
It is approximately five to six years ago that
we first noticed sales of tobacco and cigarettes beginning to
slip and after some time we were offered the opportunity to purchase
some smuggled goods from one of the local residents, an offer
which my wife declined . . . There are many [people] involved
in this illegal activity, working in public houses, door to door
and even in school playgrounds. As my business declines I have
. . . telephoned Crimestoppers etc giving details of individuals
whom I know are involved and whilst I have had a visit from the
Customs they tell me they have not witnessed any activity and,
due to manpower shortages, basically they want the "ball
in the net" and they have bigger fish to fry thus ensuring
their jobs and salaries and safe.
From being a solvent business that operated
on a cash basis we have remortgaged twice, have numerous loans
and purchase stock on credit often going past our credit limit.
Our actual sales on cigarettes are down by £1,500-1,800 per
week, at least, and tobacco sales have been non-existent for years
and we are just one small village newsagent. Multiply that by
all the other small shopkeepers who are suffering the same and
it becomes apparent that there is a "monumental" and
unjust state of affairs in this country.
What suggestions do we make?
Bring taxation into line with
Europe. Not a policy we would have condoned at one time, but
we now believe yourselves and previous Governments have lost the
thread;
Stop deluding yourselves that
higher priced cigarettes etc are for the good of our health. There
are as many, if not more, smokers in this country and the Government
is not collecting the revenue;
Insist that all cigarettes etc
are sold at the recommended retail price, be it by small store
or supermarkets;
Penalise people buying as well
as those selling contraband goods;
Give us a TV campaign and poster
campaign that show bootleggers to be robbing society;
Make the police less apathetic
and tell them it is not something to keep referring to Customs;
Create a new style Customs officer
at ports and airports made up of retired police officers and bankrupt
newsagents who would probably work for a smaller salary;
Look seriously at licensed premises
because landlords and landladies are either frightened or
are in cahoots with smugglers and turn a blind eye because customers
will buy a drink in their struggling establishments whilst waiting
for the smuggler's boat to come in;
As well as stopping selected vehicles
on return pre-select vehicles leaving the UK and request on return
they submit to a search. Fine the person to whom the vehicle
is registered to if they fail to comply;
Be more aware that it is not only
"white van man" bringing in illegal goods; it is also
"any colour saloon man", some of retirement age. "Tenerife
man" and "Dublin man" are also people to target;
Think about withdrawal of passports.
31 July 1999
I am extremely alarmed at the Chancellor's recent
comments that he intends to increase tobacco and cigarette prices
yet again, this being done under the guise of the tax increases
going towards the NHS. The gentleman has totally missed the point!
So little of these products are now bought legally across the
counter that all this action will achieve is to push people towards
bootleggers, thus making them even richer and the likes of myself
and the NHS even poorer. In my opinion, the statement was aimed
at the uniformed members of society (non smokers, non drinkers)
and is seen as a vote winner at the next election. The facts are
that millions/billions of pounds are being lost to this country's
coffers and no amount of price increases are going to make up
the shortfall in these unpaid taxes. We are a member state of
the EEC and therefore these prices should be and must be brought
down to their price level. That, in my opinion, is the only way
to stamp out the bootlegging.
15 November 1999
The Wright Wine Company, Skipton, North Yorkshire
Constantly we receive comments from "the
general public" who, in their naivety, say how we are fortunate
to be in the north and not suffering from bootlegging, and indeed
legal imports, as they do in the south. How wrong they are. We
may not be experiencing the enormity as in the south, but I can
assure you there is a great loss of trade to the legitimate trader.
The "fortnightly van" bringing in pre-ordered liquor
is easily accessed with just a few telephone calls. The legitimate
import of "allowance free" booze has put many jobs in
peril, and not just the wine trade. Consider those affected when
a wedding is held in a marquee or village hall after a van ride
across the Channel. The hotel trade, and their suppliers, are
suffering very high losses.
23 August 1999
Bracken Bank Stores, Keighley, West Yorkshire
Our business is suffering directly as a result
of the Government's failure to stamp out smuggling . . . One of
my customers has recently been jailed, and his wife given 150
hours community service, for evading £23,000 duty on alcohol
which he sold on his sandwich delivery round. His defence was
to state that his business was suffering as a result of ill health.
But in the previous week's edition of the paper his wife is featured
with a complaint about new bedroom and kitchen fittings for their
new bungalow. The two stories speak volumes.
I have travelled through Leeds-Bradford and
Manchester Airports on many occasions and never seen a customs
official, let alone been searched by one. So please urge the Government
to create some jobs and stamp out this problem.
28 August 1999
Tanners Wines Ltd, Shrewsbury
We desparately need greater parity with European
duty levels. We have lost countless weddings this summer to Calais,
added to which there are now regular "booze cruise"
bus trips from many Shropshire villages. Evidently the Exchequer
loses not only the duty but also the tax that we and our employees
would pay if we could grow unchecked by this competition.
6 September 1999
Bob's News, Leeds
Smuggling is caused by the difference in tobacco
tax between the United Kingdom and other members of the European
Union. Smuggling will continue to grow until the Government in
Westminster realises that the economic incentive to illegally
import tobacco goods is so great that no matter how many bootleggers
are put out of business others will always be ready to take their
place. The Robin Hood factor also needs to be addressed. Robbing
the rich (the Government and shopkeepers) to give to the poor
(themselves). Why pay £7.95 for 50g Golden Virginia when
you can get it for £3? Why pay £3.83 for 20 Regal King
Size when from a neighbour I can buy the same for £2.20?
My customers who used to buy tobacco goods tell me that they now
buy from people in pubs, clubs and neighbours.
The sales in tobacco goods in our shop have
halved in value over the last five years . . . I believe that
the only way to stop the majority of sales of tobacco goods becoming
illegal is to reduce tobacco taxes to the levels applied within
Europe. After all we are supposed to be one economic union. Didn't
Mrs Thatcher say that you can't buck the market? In the sale of
tobacco goods this would appear to be true and no matter how you
tinker with Customs & Excise and confidential telephone numbers
you will not stop the flood of illegal imports of tobacco goods
unless the rates of duty throughout Europe are more equal.
27 July 1999
We closed our shop for the last time on the
30 October 1999 and now have to survive on Income Support. Before
the bootlegging of cigarettes became the fashion every other customer
who frequented our shop used to buy cigarettes. Cigarettes brought
customers into the shop. In the last few months before we ceased
trading we had just three regular customers for tobacco products.
22 November 1999
|