Examination of Witness (Question 592)
WEDNESDAY 21 JUNE 2000
MS CATHY
POPE
Chairman
592. May I now call our penultimate witness,
Ms Cathy Pope.
(Ms Pope) Good afternoon. My name is
Cathy Pope. I am a 46-year-old patient from Liverpool. In 1995
I was mugged by a group of youths at a petrol station. My nose
was smashed and required a cartilage graft from my ears to rebuild
it. It was only during my recovery that I mentioned to the surgical
team about a flap of skin in the floor of my mouth. This turned
out to be cancer. In 1998 I had the floor of my mouth, jaw and
neck glands removed in a 12-hour operation. The surgeons rebuilt
my mouth, jaw and neck glands using a living graft from my leg.
I then had a course of radiotherapy, which lasted for seven weeks.
Thankfully I am cured, but I have been told that if the cancer
had been left for a few weeks more it would have been inoperable.
In 1998 3,400 new cases were diagnosed. I was one of those cases
and as such I am lucky: 1,600 patients died and this is unacceptable.
This leads me to my first point: patient education and early diagnosis.
Head and neck cancers are an area of growing concern with the
incidence increasing year on year. It is now the fifteenth commonest
cancer in this country and is as common as cervical cancer. Yet,
incredibly, there is no screening programme and little education.
The sharpest increase seems to be in younger patients, especially
females. Like my cancer, the symptoms are quite subtle and unfortunately
over 40 per cent of patients present at the initial appointment
already at stage four of the disease. If we screen patients for
cervical cancer, why do we not do the same for head and neck cancer
patients? The mouth is so easy to access and examine with none
of the taboos associated with cervical cancer screening. We need
to raise awareness amongst patients, doctors and allied health
professionals who can all help by promoting regular oral examinations.
Oral cancer is smoking and alcohol related. There is a need for
a national education strategy, in particular targeting patients
who are both heavy smokers and drinkers. When I go to my GP there
are several pamphlets on other cancers, for example cervical,
breast and prostate, but nothing on head and neck cancer. I have
found in my wide discussions with patients and support groups
that there is an overwhelming ignorance as to the dangers of smoking
and drinking. In addition, strange as it may seem, even nuns can
present with this most cruel of cancers. Rehabilitation is part
of the cancer journey. Rehabilitation and reintegration into society
is important to all cancer sufferers. My type of cancer is particularly
cruel but thanks to the wonders of modem microvascular free tissue
transfer techniques, I have been rebuilt. You can see that for
yourselves. My scarring is minimal and unless you knew of my medical
history, you would have no perception of what has gone on. Fortunately
I am luckier than most, as I was diagnosed and treated in one
of the best centres in the UK and I have retained my ability to
speak. Also the surgeons have placed titanium implants into my
new jaw so that I can eat, though this still remains a daily challenge
and I am still fed through a tube in my stomach. Rehabilitation
involves a large multidisciplinary team, which includes oncologists,
speech therapist, physiotherapists, counsellors, dieticians. Such
intensive resources make it essential that patients are treated
in a limited number of centres of excellence. From personal experience,
if you have cancer, you are prepared to travel anywhere to get
the best treatment and aftercare. Without this form of rehabilitation
I should have been a social outcast and it is not difficult to
imagine why, in the not so distant past, suicides amongst head
and neck cancer patients were not uncommon. Even in the well-established
maxillofacial cancer centres rehabilitation is delayed because
of lack of funding. I appreciate that it is expensive but I feel
very strongly that without this expertise being available to every
patient, the cancer journey can become a never-ending nightmare.
The funding for research is my third and final point. I should
like to bring your attention to the lack of funding for head and
neck cancer research. Compared to America where cancer research
is government funded, a relatively small amount of government
money is spent on cancer research in the UK. It is mainly funded
by charitable donations. It also appears that there is a North/South
divide when funding research. This is particularly strange when
one considers that the incidence of oral cancer in the North is
around twice that of the South. More money should be allocated
to head and neck cancer research and this should be targeted to
cancer black spots. To gain further understanding of this most
disfiguring of cancers, we need not only a limited number of regional
cancer centres, but also a national supra-regional centre of excellence
in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland with one correlated
national centre where all the data can be collected. I have an
invitation for you. In summary, I hope to speak for all oral cancer
sufferers. I know the Committee is visiting Christie's in Manchester.
I urge you to travel a few extra miles down the M62 and visit
the University Hospital Aintree so that you may witness at first
hand the innovative structure of this unit and use it as a benchmark
for cancer services nationally.
Chairman: Thank you very much indeed. You have
presented so well. We shall bear your invitation in mind but may
I say you are a marvellous example of the courage that so many
cancer patients have. Thank you for coming to speak to us this
afternoon.
|