Examination of Witness (Questions 581
- 582)
WEDNESDAY 21 JUNE 2000
MR FRED
WALKER
Chairman
581. I now call Mr Fred Walker of the Castleford
and District Cancer Self Help Group.
(Mr Walker) Thank you Chairman. Firstly,
ladies and gentlemen, may I take this opportunity to express my
gratitude to the Committee for allowing me to appear before them
today. In my statement to you I have expressed my background and
where I am coming from. Today, suffice for me to say that I was
diagnosed with cancer in 1983. After having my bladder and a kidney
out and an intensive course of chemotherapy I have been involved
with cancer patients and their carers ever since. Awareness throughout
the years is our main concern. We are all potential patients and
are not being made aware at an early age of what can go wrong
with our bodies through ignorance and lack of knowledge. We believe
we should be made aware of what can and quite often does go wrong
with our bodies later on in our lives. In many cases, in our opinion,
this could have been prevented, especially testicular cancer,
through self-examination. Many people who have had diagnosis of
cancer, felt that had their GPs checked for cancer first then
their prognosis might not have been as bad and many lives could
have been saved. On prostate cancer, if I could take you on to
that, I should like to bring to your attention the research or
perhaps lack of it. Statistics prove that there are many more
men dying with prostate cancer than there are women dying with
breast cancer and yet more money is going into research into breast
cancer. I have not come here today to have a go at the ladies.
We believe that in our opinion it should be applauded because
they have made their concerns known to anybody and everybody who
would listen. Men, for whatever reasons, have not done the same.
We are told "Big boys don't cry". They also felt if
they went to their GP, as the main breadwinner in the family perhaps
many hardships would be caused because they would have to stop
work. Unfortunately as a result of not going to the GPs, many
of them die. Where do we start? After many discussions and many
conferences with many cancer patients and carers since 1983 here
are some of my and their suggestions. Many of them as recently
as Thursday, Friday and Saturday and Sunday of last week at the
National Conference of Cancer Self Help Groups, where we run workshops,
many of them on men's cancers. We believe we should take the awareness
campaigns into schools as part of the curriculum, the sooner the
better. Take the awareness into places frequented by men and boys,
examples being football grounds, to use football programmes to
advertise it, into the local pubs, the working men's clubs, the
gents toilets, the lists are endless. Well-persons' clinics. Where
I live in West Yorkshire many well-women's clinics; very few well-men's
clinics. Perhaps I am suggesting to you that we should have well-persons'
clinics to allocate some time for men. Perhaps that could be monitored
by community health councils, perhaps we should be going to men's
gymnasiums advocating awareness. Sponsorship came out at one of
our workshops for men's cancers and it was suggested perhaps manufacturers
of toilet paper. What a good idea. Complementary therapies, yes.
Over the years I have seen the quality of life improve not only
of hundreds but perhaps thousands of people who have been diagnosed
with cancer as a result of using complementary therapies. As a
result of that the quality of the life of the people who have
cared for them has also been dramatically improved upon. I therefore
submit to the Committee that complementary therapies should be
adequately resourced, funded and perhaps monitored where you feel
it necessary. In conclusion, if we are sincere in taking a fresh
look at research into cancer services, all my colleagues without
exception and I are all of the same opinion: where committees
are being set up to discuss funding and research we are of the
opinion that these committees should include people who have been
diagnosed with cancer and perhaps their carers at all levels of
decision making and not just as a tokenistic gesture. Adequate
resources and funding should be made available for training, for
writing reports and to help them overcome and understand the jargon
which is so often used. May I thank you all very much for listening?
Chairman: Thank you very much indeed for a most
impressive piece of evidence.
Dr Williams
582. You mentioned breast cancer versus prostate
cancer and that the amount of money is in reverse proportion to
the number of deaths. How should we decide in the cancer budget
how much goes to breast cancer, how much to prostate, how much
to bladder and whatever?
(Mr Walker) Perhaps we need to involve community health
councils more. I have been involved with the community health
council in the Pontefract area for the last eight years, not only
as a member but as a Vice-Chair and Chair visiting hospitals and
seeing some of the shortfalls in the hospitals because people
have not been diagnosed early enough with prostate cancer. Make
men aware of how to get themselves diagnosed, how to get to the
hospitals, what the symptoms are, what to look out for and things
like this. Ladies do that amongst ladies. We need the ladies perhaps
to kick us men up the backside to go to the doctor. I hope I have
answered your question.
Chairman: I come from the Nottinghamshire/Yorkshire
borders and I think you have answered in a good Yorkshire way
and thank you very much indeed for it. Thank you for your evidence.
|