Examination of Witness (Question 556)
WEDNESDAY 21 JUNE 2000
MR KEITH
TAYLOR
Chairman
556. I now call Dr Keith Taylor. Good afternoon.
(Mr Taylor) May I begin by saying that
I am not a doctor, I am a humble patient. I am a kidney cancer
patient and also co-founder and Secretary of Kidney Cancer UK,
an organisation which I helped to set up in January of this year
to support kidney cancer patients and carers. One of our main
aims is to collect and make available reliable information about
the nature of the disease and treatment options. Sadly, many patients
are not provided with such information by their local hospitals.
At worse, some patients are simply told that there is nothing
that can be done about kidney cancer once it has metastasised.
Because there are only a few kidney cancer specialists in the
UK, many patients do not have the opportunity to see an expert.
In some cases they are never told about, let alone offered, access
to promising clinical trials and innovative treatments. This was
my own experience when I was diagnosed in September 1998, and
that is why I have spent the last 19 months doing my own extensive
research on kidney cancer and its treatment, even though I am
not a doctor. There are two major problems with kidney cancer.
The first is late diagnosis. I myself went to see several GPs
over a period of four years with persistent physical symptoms,
but had no investigative tests for cancer. By the time I was diagnosed,
after losing blood in my urine, a tumour of about seven centimetres
in diameter was discovered on my left kidney. I was also found
to have a large number of lung metastases. My experience, I regret
to say, is fairly typical of kidney cancer patients. Therefore,
there is an urgent need to apply scientific knowledge more effectively
to the early diagnosis of kidney cancer. The second problem is
that kidney cancer does not respond well to conventional cancer
treatments. Therefore more research is needed into innovative
approaches, especially immunotherapy. After a patient has had
his or her kidney and primary tumour removed by surgery, it is
often necessary to deal with metastases that have appeared in
other parts of the body. In general, chemotherapy and radiotherapy
have little impact on metastatic kidney cancer. This means that
if doctors do not have the knowledge or resources to apply biological
therapies, then the prognosis for any kidney cancer patient with
metastases is poor. Relatively few such patients survive more
than five years and many die within the first year or two. In
previous evidence to this Committee, Professor Peter Selby expressed
the hope that in the next ten years there will be much more research
into biological cancer therapies, including the use of vaccines.
I should like to endorse this statement. The development of scientific
knowledge in these areas and its translation into clinical practice
will undoubtedly be of benefit not only to kidney cancer patients
but also to other cancer patients for whom conventional treatments
prove ineffective or inappropriate. The concept of stimulating
the patient's own immune system to recognise and eliminate cancer
cells has a long history and if we could follow through this approach
to fruition it would reduce our dependency on the use of chemotherapy
and radiotherapy, with all their unpleasant and potentially harmful
side effects. Let me stress once again that for patients with
metastatic kidney cancer, immunotherapy offers the only hope of
long-term survival. However, access to immunotherapy, including
vaccine treatment, is still very limited in this country. The
UKCCCR renal cancer group has expressed concern that many patients
who would qualify for clinical trials are not given the necessary
information and support to join these trials. I have to say that
in some cases the doctors themselves do not seem to have this
information. This is why, increasingly, patients like myself are
doing their own research and presenting their doctors with information
that they have obtained from libraries and the internet. Because
kidney cancer is one of the rarer forms of cancer, the average
UK hospital does not see many kidney cancer patients each year.
Most oncologists dealing with kidney cancer combine this specialisation
with the treatment of other forms of cancer. They simply do not
have the time, resources or support staff to devote themselves
to kidney cancer research. The main conclusion I draw from this
is that for many kidney cancer patients, going to their local
hospital will not lead them to the best information or the best
treatment. What we need is a small number of centres of excellence
for the treatment of kidney cancer and a system which ensures
that all patients can gain access to these centres.
Chairman: Thank you very much indeed. Well prepared.
I am sure you must have read that through to get the timing absolutely
right. Your final word coincided with a pip here. We have no time
for questions but it was so well presented and it is recorded
and we shall study it again later. Thank you so much.
|