Memorandum submitted by Kidney Cancer
UK
INTRODUCTION
1. Kidney Cancer UK was founded in January
2000 by Keith Taylor and Dick Williams, two kidney cancer patients.
It is the first support organisation for kidney cancer patients
and carers to be established in the UK. It aims to provide improved
access to reliable information about the disease and its treatment,
to establish a network of individuals and groups capable of offering
mutual support, and to raise public awareness of the needs of
kidney cancer patients and carers. It organises quarterly national
meetings and occasional educational lectures, publishes a bi-monthly
Newsletter, provides an informative web site, and uses Internet
technology to provide an online discussion forum for discussion
among all KCUK members wherever they live. Although the main purpose
of KCUK is to assist patients and carers in the UK, it receives
an increasing number of requests for information from abroad and
does what it can to respond positively to such enquiries.
KIDNEY CANCER
RESEARCH NEEDS
2. Kidney cancer is one of the rarer forms
of cancer (about 5,000 new cases are diagnosed each year in the
UK) and therefore it has tended to attract insufficient attention
in discussions of cancer research priorities. There are also only
a small number of kidney cancer specialists in this country. As
a result, many patients do not have the opportunity to consult
with an expert. In some cases they are never told about, let alone
offered, access to promising clinical trials and innovative treatments.
3. There are two major aspects of kidney
cancer which have direct implications for decisions about a research
strategy. The first problem is late diagnosis. The vast majority
of patients are diagnosed when their primary tumour is already
quite large and the disease has spread to other parts of the body.
Therefore, there is an urgent need to apply scientific knowledge
more effectively to the early diagnosis of kidney cancer. If kidney
cancer is detected before it metastasises, there is a real chance
that the patient can be cured.
4. The second problem is that kidney cancer
does not respond well to conventional cancer treatments, and therefore
more research is needed into innovative approaches, especially
immunotherapy. After a patient has had his or her kidney and primary
tumour removed by surgery, it is often necessary to deal with
metastases that have appeared in other parts of the body. In general,
chemotherapy and radiotherapy have little impact on metastatic
kidney cancer. This means that if doctors do not have the knowledge
or resources to apply biological therapies, then the prognosis
for any kidney cancer patient with metastases is poor. Relatively
few such patients survive more than five years and many die within
the first year or two.
IMMUNOTHERAPY AND
THE ROLE
OF CANCER
VACCINES
5. In previous evidence to the Committee,
Professor Peter Selby expressed the hope that in the next ten
years there will be more research into biological cancer therapies,
including the use of vaccines. This is a vitally important issue
for kidney cancer patients. The development of scientific knowledge
in these areas and its translation into clinical practice will
undoubtedly be of benefit not only to kidney cancer patients but
also to other cancer patients for whom conventional treatments
prove ineffective or inappropriate. The concept of stimulating
the patient's own immune system to recognise and eliminate cancer
cellsor at least to inhibit the further progression of
the diseasehas a long history, and if we could follow through
this approach to fruition it would reduce our dependency on the
use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, with all their unpleasant
and potentially harmful side effects.
6. For patients with metastatic kidney cancer,
immunotherapy offers the only hope of long-term survival. However,
access to immunotherapy, including vaccine treatment, is still
very limited in this country. Interferon-alpha has become the
most widely used form of immunotherapy for metastatic kidney cancer,
but patient response rates remain disappointingly low. Kidney
Cancer UK believes that there is a strong case for making Interleukin-2
(IL-2) more widely available than it is at present in the UK in
order to assist patients who do not respond to Interferon-alpha.
It seems odd, to say the least, that IL-2 has been approved by
the Food and Drug Administration in the United States as the recommended
treatment for metastatic kidney cancer, but in Britain there has
been no such endorsement. In many European countries, too, IL-2
is generally available to kidney cancer patients with metastases.
Interestingly, the most experienced kidney cancer specialists
(and researchers) in the UK do offer patients IL-2 in appropriate
circumstances, but there remain many health authorities in the
UK which do not make the drug available, even in cases where Interferon-alpha
has failed to help a patient.
7. There have been promising results internationally
from experimental trials with kidney cancer vaccines of various
kinds. In some cases, vaccines are made using material from the
patient's own primary tumour and/or metastases. Kidney Cancer
UK believes that this area of research needs to be strengthened,
and that in general research into cancer immunology needs to be
integrated more fully into the UK's cancer research effort.
ANTI-ANGIOGENESIS
8. Another promising approach to the management
of kidney cancer is the use of various anti-angiogenesis agents,
for example thalidomide, which seek to inhibit the growth of tumours
by suppressing the development of their vascular blood supply.
While recognising that this research is in its early stages, Kidney
Cancer UK believes that since metastatic kidney cancer is usually
deemed "incurable", there is every reason to support
further research into anti-angiogenesis. This is a good example
of an area of cancer research which seems to have developed much
more slowly in the UK than in the United States and some other
European countries.
ACCESS TO
CLINICAL TRIALS
9. The UKCCCR renal cancer group has expressed
concern that many patients who would qualify for clinical trials
are not given the necessary information and support to join those
trials. In some cases, it seems that the doctors themselves do
not have this information. This is why, increasingly, patients
are doing their own research and presenting their doctors with
information that they have obtained from libraries and the Internet.
There is an urgent need for more clinical trials for kidney cancer,
since the pace of improvement of treatment for patients is extremely
slow at present. Furthermore, information about clinical trials
needs to be more widely disseminated among patients and medical
professionals.
CENTRES OF
EXCELLENCE
10. Because kidney cancer is one of the
rarer forms of cancer, the average UK hospital does not see many
kidney cancer patients each year, and most oncologists dealing
with kidney cancer combine this specialisation with the treatment
of other forms of cancer. They simply do not have the time, resources
or support staff to devote themselves to kidney cancer research,
and they do not see enough patients to develop their practical
understanding of the disease. Thus, for many kidney cancer patients,
going to their local hospital will not lead them to the best information
or the best treatment. What we need is a small number of centres
of excellence for the treatment of kidney cancer, and a system
that ensures that all patients can gain access to these centres.
INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION
11. Because kidney cancer is one of the
rarer forms of cancer, it is especially important for researchers
to collaborate internationally. In this way, a much greater range
of experience and specialist knowledge can be pooled than is possible
within a single country. There are, for example, many more kidney
cancer patients and more medical specialists dealing with kidney
cancer in the United States than in Britain, and therefore the
results of kidney cancer research in the US need to be studied
carefully by scientists and medical professionals in the UK. Similarly,
opportunities for European-wide research should be developed to
supplement national research efforts. Using the latest computerised
information technology, it is much easier than ever before to
gain access to details of research activities in other countries,
to foster international collaboration, and to share information.
Everything possible should be done to encourage this process as
part of a cancer research strategy.
THE INVOLVEMENT
OF KIDNEY
CANCER PATIENTS
AND CARERS
12. Until Kidney Cancer UK was established
in January 2000, there was no kidney cancer patients' organisation
in this country. As a result, there seem to have been no opportunities
for kidney cancer patients and carers to be involved in the decision-making
processes of cancer research organisations. Kidney Cancer UK fully
endorses the view expressed by Cancerlink in its Memorandum of
evidence that "Cancer patients and carers should be involved
in decisions about research at every levelfrom deciding
on research priorities to application and dissemination".
Hitherto, kidney cancer patients' own assessment of their needs
have not been taken into account within the cancer research process.
Kidney Cancer UK believes that this situation should not be allowed
to continue and that, for example, a national kidney cancer conference
involving scientific researchers, medical professionals, patients
and carers should be held every yearas it is in the United
Statesto establish an institutional basis for constructive
debate and the exchange of views and information. Kidney Cancer
UK is willing to help in any way to organise such a conference.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
13. A range of supplementary material accompanies
this Memorandum. This provides further information relating to
the various concerns expressed above, and in particular to promising
areas of kidney cancer research that, in the opinion of Kidney
Cancer UK, must be strengthened if the treatment of this disease
is to be improved. If this is not done, then it seems likely that
for most kidney cancer patients their prognosis will remain poor.
21 June 2000
|