APPENDIX 55
Memorandum submitted by Pilkington Optronics
"To inquiry into the manner in which companies
in the fields of engineering and physical sciences decide on developing
new products and processes and the factors influencing their decisions
with particular reference to the industrial application of Government
funded research".
1. INTRODUCTION
Pilkington Optronics designs and manufacturers
electro-optical systems, modules and components mainly for the
defence industry and is one of the largest optronic solution suppliers
in the world. With an annual revenue of £115 million and
sales to over 50 countries Pilkington Optronics is a truly global
company.
Over the last five years the company has invested
in two new facilities (in Scotland and in north London) and has
greatly modernised its third facility in North Wales.
In particular Pilkington Optronics with the
Defence Evaluation and Research Agency have developed an extremely
high resolution thermal imager using a long linear array detector.
This imager is known as Stairs'C' and has world leading thermal
imaging performance. The United States are developing a similar
sensor (called SADA) which although not quite meeting the performance
of Stairs'C' is likely, through the economy of scale, to be lower
in cost to manufacture.
2. SUMMARY
Pilkington Optronics supports the Government
policy of competition but within an environment where competition
enables a healthy growth of an essential indigenous capability.
New Product Development, in particular that fostered by UK Government
partial support, must be focused to meet a need. The co-ordination
of the Government need and the government sponsored research is
essential for the health of the industry.
3. IR SENSOR
TECHNOLOGY
The need for competition in the MOD procurement
process is not questionedhowever it is clearly in the national
interest that the competitive process does not unnecessarily escalate
the eventual cost of the in-service product and that the procurement
of overseas technology (particularly from the US) does not dilute
the indigenous national capability.
Pilkington Optronics reinvest some 8 per cent
to 10 per cent of our turnover directed at future product in R&T
it is essential that we invest in the right things.
Although we are prepared to invest some of our
R&T funding in more generic and underpinning research, and
somewhat more on process improvement and engineering efficiency,
most of our investment must be structured around specific military
functions. We can increase the efficiency of our engineering process
as much as we like but unless we focus on the right programmes
we are wasting our investment.
In short we must do the right things and we must
do the right things at the right time
Only when the integrity of the need is sound
will industry obtain a return on investment through series production.
We take much of our lead from the national defence
research organisations such as DERA and it is a fact of the matter
that the research community at some levels within DERA have too
strong a vested interest in their own research programmes to make
objective judgements on the correct directions of research and
are consequently often the last people to determine the research
programmes in which we should invest.
It is essential therefore that government clearly
specify the need. It is only with a clear understanding of the
need can Industry be in a position to make the right judgement
in response to this need by aligning their PV investment to meet
it. In addition the timing of the need is required to be clearly
understood.
The STAIRS C Technology Demonstrator Programme
is an example where the partnership between UK industry and MoD
has achieved a world leading thermal imaging capability but, to
date, has lacked the necessary co-ordination to enable success:
The jointly funded Mod/Pilkington
Optronics STAIRS "C" programme has demonstrated World
leading thermal imaging performance, PO have continued to invest
to enhance the target identification capability of the DERA demonstrators.
A Technology Demonstrator Programme
(TDP) in isolation with future procurement on a case by case basis
and export restriction creates uncertainty for UK industry. Under
these circumstances further investment is difficult to justify.
The structured and fully funded US
SADA technology offers a short term lower performance alternative
for key UK programmes, but its use would lead to certain death
of an independent UK capability followed by high US prices and
limited access. Exploitation of future leading technologies from
DERA will be difficult without a successful revenue generating
industry.
Co-ordinated procurement to achieve
commonality of high performance EO would yield cost, risk and
time scale reductions for MoD. Additionally, relaxed export control
would increase pay back for both MoD and industry. The UK's 1st
generation TCM programme was highly successful, 9,300 units have
been sold, the majority of these were exported generating significant
levy revenue.
Pilkington Optronics propose a continued
partnership with MoD to establish 2nd generation modules based
on STAIRS C which would maintain the UK's world lead in night
vision.
There is little point in our investing heavily
in a Government sponsored IR Sensor programme such as Stairs "C"
if at the completion of the development programme there is no
programme with the sensor need and it is additionally frustrating
if we are also not free to sell the technology overseas. It is
even more frustrating if any need should be satisfied by overseas
procurement and we are still prohibited to sell freely overseas.
22 October 1998
|