APPENDIX 52
Memorandum submitted by Oilfield Systems
Limited
INTRODUCTION
1. Oilfield Systems Limited is a UK company
founded in 1984 to develop advanced software solutions for the
oil and gas exploration and production market. The company is
based in Southampton with offices in Aberdeen, Calgary and Houston.
The company has developed GeoScene (a geological workstation),
DAEX (a data migration solution), Quadrate (multi-screen handling
for Unix computers) and FaMOUS (3D reservoir modelling system).
2. Oilfield Systems has employed between
10 and 25 people since 1989, with a current staff of 22. Revenues
have grown to c £1.5 million per annum. The company has been
only marginally profitable overall, mainly because of high continued
investment in support and new product development.
3. Oilfield Systems has been a participant
in two LINK scheme projects: Project No 7246 (FaMOUS: A new tool
for geological modelling) and Project No 7256 (Improved hydrocarbon
recovery through the integration of geological, petrophysical
and engineering data from non-conventional wells).
HOW FIRST
LEARNED ABOUT
LINK
4. We originally heard about LINK through
our contacts at the Offshore Supplies Office in Glasgow (now the
Infrastructure and Energy Projects Directorate). That organisation
had provided excellent support to our fledgling organisation in
the late 80's by providing partial funding for our first major
product development, GeoScene, which is today a successful software
product.
WHY WE
PARTICIPATED AND
OUR EXPERIENCE
5. In both cases, the academic partner had
developed expertise, complementary to our own, which we considered
could be developed commercially using our skills and experience
of bringing successful software products to market.
6. In both cases, finding industry support
was very difficult, taking a minimum of six months. In addition,
one of the proposals had to be submitted twice to the LINK Committee
before support was forthcoming. Once the award was made, the running
of the projects was smooth and regular meetings between the partners
and sponsor companies has ensured a free flow of information.
DID OUR
INVOLVEMENT MEET
OUR OBJECTIVES?
7. In both cases, progress has been less
than that forecast. This is no criticism of the LINK Scheme, of
the academic partner or of ourselves. Rather, the nature of the
projects is, by its definition, risky and there are many unknowns
to be tackled between innovation and commercialisation. In each
project, we have contributed more than we intended.
8. Neither Project has yet yielded financial
benefits (as net contributors we are significantly out of pocket)
though each is expected to break even within the next year.
WHAT IMPACT
HAS LINK HAD
ON OUR
COMPANY?
9. One of the main benefits has been the
contact that LINK has mediated between ourselves and academic
partners. This has, in turn, encouraged us to work more closely
with academic institutions who are gateways to early adopters
of our technology.
10. The funding from LINK to Oilfield Systems
has only covered a percentage of our incurred costs but has nonetheless
been very welcome and gratefully received.
WHAT BARRIERS
HAVE PREVENTED
HIGHER GAIN?
11. LINK excludes marketing and sales effort
from consideration as chargeable costs to the project. Today,
more than ever, good products fail because of inadequate marketing
and sales effort. To get the most of our nation's innovation we
must recognise that good marketing and sales is as important as
technical development.
OVERALL ASSESSMENT
12. Positive. Any support to promote collaboration
between sources and consumers of innovation is definitely a good
thing.
13. The LINK Scheme, with its projects approval
committee, sorts out viable projects from those considered inappropriate
to the industry's current needs. However, more could be made of
this in that approval by LINK should perhaps be a primary requirement
for industry sponsorship. By working in concert with companies,
the industrial sponsorship element would be more easily accessed,
reducing the cost, effort and delay caused by seeking out industrial
sponsors after LINK approval has been forthcoming.
8 January 1999
|