APPENDIX 26
Memorandum submitted by the Economic and
Social Research Council's Innovation Programme
1. The Economic and Social Research Council
is the UK's leading research and training agency addressing economic
and social concerns. Among its research portfolio are a series
of major investments addressing the crucial role of innovation
in sustaining the creation of wealth and the quality of life.
One such is the £3.5 million "Innovation Programme"
which is concerned with the role of innovative management in the
achievement of sustained improvement in the performance of public
and private sector organisations and businesses. In particular
it focuses on the human and organisational conditions that contribute
to this, and a feature of the programme is the close collaboration
between academics and "practitioners", including engineering
and physical sciences based companies. The academics involved
also cover a range of disciplines including engineering.
2. This short memorandum wishes to draw
the attention of the Committee to the experience of the programme
which is demonstrating very clearly that some of the key business
processes involved in the exploitation of science and technology
by engineering and physics based companies are not peculiar to
them but are common across all business sectors and size of company.
These relate particularly to the institution of organisational
structures and people management policies which stimulate and
sustain a supportive climate for innovation. There is, therefore,
much to be gained by taking a much broader view of innovation
in engineering and physics based companies than is implicit in
the Committee's terms of reference, and the Committee is recommended
also to refer to the experience of other sectors in tackling these
analogous and core processes.
3. As an illustration of the importance
of cross-fertilisation, a few relevant examples from the experience
thrown up by the Innovation Programme are now described.
4. A company falling very much within the
Committee's interest is Pilkington Optronics, a leading high tech
company in the defence sector which is making a major investment
in new organisational processes to support an innovative, customer-oriented,
production process. A multidisciplinary research team from Lancaster
University undertook an analysis of the introduction of new approaches
to manufacturing, a study of the problems of introducing and integrating
new specialisms into the organisation, and on-line observation
of the work of cross-disciplinary design teams. The study suggested
that the management of the capture and flow of knowledge within
project teams, between them, and in the context of overall company
strategy and market positioning are key processes. Assumptions
that organisations can be managed like machinery are unlikely
to help in complex situations such as those of companies like
Pilkington Optronics. It is important for employees in such organisations
to be able to engage in learning cycles in which they can question,
consider, communicate, model, improvise and reconstruct ideas,
and that such learning is properly integrated into organisational
activities. The design of the project and the testing of ideas
emerging as it proceeded benefited considerably from the experience
of a group of other interested companies including the utilities
and chemistry based firms.
5. Also in the knowledge management area,
researchers from UMIST looked at how this was done in R&D
functions associated with a multi-sectoral grouping involving
Hewlett Packard, ICI, Amersham International, British Aerospace
and Ove Arup. The information obtained enabled the researchers
to come up with a generic audit tool which will provide a much
wider population of companies with a basic "health check"
to identify where their knowledge management practices are falling
below desirable performance levels, and how the shortfalls might
be addressed.
6. The audit tool just described is the
outcome of one of a number of projects are investigating techniques
to assist in the management of the innovation process. Researchers
in Plymouth are devising a scenario tool to help managers predict
what might be the effects of major organisational discontinuities
in companies such as restructuring, takeover, merger etc. While
a project based at East Anglia University is looking at the implementation
in the UK of the "Hoshin Kanri" management technique.
This integrates long-term strategic objectives with daily operations
by aligning people with a common focus, and by installing an organisational
adaptability so that at any one time, employees at all levels
can know where they stand with regard to top policy and what is
happening in the external environment. Again both projects are
working with engineering and physics based companies alongside
companies from the chemical and life sciences and services sectors.
7. The philosophy of partnership between
academia and business, catalysed by Government support, underpins
the nature of the Innovation Programme and other similar ESRC
investments. The Programme is also contributing to the development
of policy to support such partnerships, through a series of consultations
on how they may be encouraged and sustained. Networking between
and among researchers and practitioners is also a strong feature
of the Programme with most of the projects having multi-sectoral
advisory groups associated with them, such as the Lancaster/Pilkington
project described above, contributing to the cross-fertilisation
of ideas.
8. The Innovation Programme therefore is
a practical demonstration of how the previous Select Committee's
thinking (as described in "The Routes through which the Science
Base is translated into Innovative and Competitive Technology[21])
is being progressed, particularly those aspects of it relating
to the need for a holistic view of innovation, the role of management,
the value of networking, and of partnership between Government,
business and academia. It is hoped that in its deliberations the
Committee will take into account the need for comparisons with
this wider experience of common problems.
30 April 1998
21 First Report, Session 1993-94 (HC 74). Back
|