APPENDIX 22
Memorandum submitted by the Construction
Research and Innovation Strategy Panel (CRISP)
INTRODUCTION
1. The Construction Research and Innovation
Strategy Panel (CRISP) is an industry/government Panel which exists
to promote the exploitation and application of innovation and
research in construction and associated industries. It brings
together users, funders and providers of research from across
the industry and its clients. It aims to identify, prioritise
and facilitate research to support innovative thinking and to
encourage its application to promote cultural change and delivery
of client value. CRISP is funded by the Construction Sponsorship
Directorate of DETR and also enjoys active participation by the
Highways Agency and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research
Council, who seek the benefits of a co-ordinated research strategy
for construction. This response is submitted on behalf of the
industry members of the Panel. Its mission statement is at Annex
A[16]
and a background note and constitution at Annex B & C16.
SUMMARY
2. CRISP believes that the achievement of
significant improvement in the productivity, cost effectiveness,
quality and environmental impact of construction in the UK requires
major change in the processes by which construction businesses
operate. Improved productivity, efficiency and competitiveness
require the appropriate application of research to support innovation,
which requires the maintenance of a strong science base in the
universities and research organisations. CRISP believes that there
is a significant need for more effort to be focused on transferring
research outputs into practical applications and tools for practitioners,
through schemes such as the Construction Best Practice Programme
and collaborative industry led research programmes.
SUBMISSION
3. CRISP was established in response to
a review of government sponsorship of the construction industry,
which, amongst other things, recommended that:
"...the dissemination of research results
to the industry needs to be improved".
4. CRISP was given responsibility for advising
the then DOE on Industry priorities for research and innovation.
Since its formation as an industry/government Panel in 1995. CRISP
has contributed significantly to:
the introduction by the DETR of Business
Plans which set out the rationale for its Construction Research
Programme and set out the basis for adjusting the current balance
of research funding.
the EPSRC restructuring of its Engineering
Programmes and the formulation of the EPSRC Business Plan for
1998-99.
5. CRISP welcomes these moves to clarify
the strategy, role and purpose of these funding programmes. The
Panel recommend that these new arrangements are now allowed to
develop for a reasonable period before further significant changes
in the funding arrangements and the balance of funding for research
and innovation are proposed. The Panel notes that in some sectors
funding decisions are made on a longer term basis than in the
construction related sectors.
Industrial Application of Research & Role
of EPSRC
6. The Panel recommend that there is significant
scope for improved application of research and dissemination of
research outputs, particularly from the university sector. It
is aware of the efforts which EPSRC and DETR are making to address
this issue. There is also a need for the industry to learn more
from other industry sectors. This can in part be addressed through
existing programmes, such as the Technology Transfer Secondment
Scheme or the proposed PRAISE (Placing Research Assistants in
Industrial Secondments) scheme. It will also be addressed by placing
even greater emphasis on the application and implementation of
outputs.
7. In the construction sector this will
also be addressed by the Construction Best Practice Programme,
a new initiative funded by the DETR and run jointly with the Construction
Industry Board, which has arisen from the work of CRISP. The Best
Practice Programme seeks to foster improved use of existing research
and innovation in the construction sector, including the provision
of exemplars and case study demonstrations. EPSRC are also placing
greater emphasis on the application of research, and the Panel
welcome this.
8. The Panel recognise that as well as providing
knowledge to help the industry to innovate there is also a need
for a cultural change within the industry to increase its desire
to innovate. This issue does not appear to be addressed in the
committee terms of reference, but the Panel believe that this
is a fundamental issue to greater application of research in the
construction industry.
Independent Research Organisations
9. Industry owned research organisations
are also a focus for collaborative research and the dissemination
of technical process and market information. They often play a
key role in their members' development of new products and services,
particularly in the case of SMEs. They do this by:
undertaking research and dissemination
programmes to motivate innovation and the application of knowledge;
helping their industry to keep abreast
of technical and market trends thereby assisting them to justify
the development of a new product or service;
providing immediate access to technical
information or an expert to assist in the development process;
provide independent product testing
to stimulate market confidence and demand; and
disseminating knowledge of the product
or service through their information services.
10. There are now no government laboratories
operating in the construction sector.
Collaborative Programmes
11. Industry members of CRISP support the
DETR programme of funding for collaborative research involving
industry and research organisations, Partners in Technology, the
EPSRC Innovative Manufacturing Initiative and the jointly funded
LINK programme. These contribute to improved application of Government-funded
research in the construction sector and promote industry led collaboration
in research. CRISP believes the LINK programme would benefit from
clarification of the rules governing the availability of funding
to research organisations.
12. Industry is, however, concerned at the
increasing complexity of the process for obtaining government
support and at the length of time to obtain funding for work when
product development cycles are becoming increasingly short, particularly
where IT systems are involved.
13. Company strategy, which is driven by
market factors, is the key to encouraging greater innovation.
Innovation will be supported when it contributes to the achievement
of the overall strategy. This will often require short term research
work. Government funded research programmes, whilst they do not
directly support individual company plans, create a supportive
climate for research and innovation, promote an innovative culture
and provide a reservoir of completed research and a skilled research
base on which industry can draw, sometimes at very short notice.
This is essential to the ongoing competitiveness of the industry.
In particular, the industry research organisations are a key resource
for the industry and provide a wide array of triggers to further
innovation.
14. Construction is a sector which is heavily
regulated. Regulations address planning, construction, including
both design and site activity, health and safety in use and fire
regulation. The 1981 White Paper on "The Future of Building
Control in England and Wales" noted that the form of the
Building Regulations then in force "is inflexible for many
purposes, inhibits innovation and imposes unnecessary costs."
This observation may be more widely applicableexcessively
prescriptive regulation can fossilise technology and practice
by forcing everyone to do something in a particular way. On the
other hand, a regulation that sets a performance standard beyond
current practice ought to have the effect of accelerating the
introduction of new methods. In response to the ideas set out
in the White Paper, the Building Regulations were extensively
recast in the 1985 revision, moving away from prescription towards
performance specification where possible. CRISP endorses the view
that regulation should be performance-based rather than prescriptive
and that consideration should be given to possible impacts on
innovation when regulations are made or revised.
15. Within construction, much activity is
governed by codes, standards and regulations. These have fundamental
influence on the manufacture and use of construction materials.
Changes in practice brought about through changes in regulations
or standards often benefit a very wide constituency and assist
government in achieving policy objectives. It is important that
the research needed to underpin the development of codes and standards
continues to receive government support, and that the independent
industry research organisations continue to be funded to play
an independent role in the development of standards, codes and
regulations.
Financial Support for Application of Research
16. The primary providers of information
and the application of research in the sector are the industry
research organisations. These depend on government programmes
for support for their work, as detailed above. These programmes
provide a wide range of research of a non-proprietary nature,
such as that currently funded by the DETR and EPSRC programmes.
Much of this research is of benefit to the public or supports
government policy objectives and statutory duties and is most
unlikely to be funded by industry. Continued support that is clearly
focused on improved application of research and technology transfer
is important for the industry.
Foresight and Networks
17. The Panel co-operates closely with the
Foresight Construction Panel and is contributing to the development
of its plans for the next Foresight exercise. The Panel itself
provides a network which supports research and innovation activity
within the industry, and there are a number of other networks
which operate in various segments of the construction industry.
These provide important informal opportunities for transfer of
knowledge in a format and context which is compatible with, for
example, Continuous Professional Development arrangements.
11 March 1998
16 Not printed. Back
|