APPENDIX 7
Untitled
Memorandum submitted by Armagh City and
District Council
CONTEXT
The local economy of the Armagh area is characterised
by a weak manufacturing base which is heavily skewed towards very
small enterprise. The dependency on a small number of firms in
the manufacturing, public and agriculture sectors underlines the
vulnerability of the local economy. To this end the Council continually
strive to promote the area as a location to live, work, visit
and invest.
COUNCIL POLICY
ON ATTRACTING
INWARD INVESTMENT
Armagh City and District Council maintain a
close working relationship with IDB. Discussions are held with
officers on a regular basis to identify ways in which Council
can add value to IDB activities in this sphere, to prioritise
Armagh's ranking position as a location for inward investment
missions; and to inform and update on new programmes/projects
under implementation in the area.
In addition Council actively pursue their own
inward investment campaigna CD-Rom has been produced and
distributed at national and international levels, review and redesign
of web site is underway.
REFERENCE TO
TYPE OF
INWARD INVESTMENT
The Council do not have a particular preference
as to type of investment attracted but rather would seek to review
and assess any potential project on its merit taking into account
displacement, environmental impact, and other extenuating circumstances
as appropriate.
Nonetheless, Armagh City and District like many
other authorities recognise the considerable investments being
undertaken in the Information Communications Technology sector.
They have begun to explore the infrastructure requirements of
this sector and the compatibility of the local area to satisfy
the same.
In terms of location of any project the zoned
Industrial Estate at Edenvayes is a priority.
PAST PERFORMANCE
It must be noted that Armagh has a poor record
in attracting IDB support when contrasted with a neighbouring
council area in terms of:
Projects by location, job, investment, IDB assistance
by District Council area.
Visits to Armagh and Dungannon area by potential
Investors.
PROJECTS BY LOCATION, JOBS, INVESTMENT, AND
IDB ASSISTANCE BY DISTRICT COUNCIL AREA
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| Projects by Location
| | | |
| | | Jobs (new and safeguarded)
| | | |
| |
| 93-94 | 94-95
| 95-96 | 96-97 |
97-98 | 98-99 | 93-94
| 94-95 | 95-96 |
96-97 | 97-98 | 98-99
| |
| Armagh | 4 | 0
| 0 | 1 | 0 |
1 | 112 | 40 | 0
| 11 | 0 | 22 |
|
| Dungannon | 5 | 6
| 2 | 4 | 3 |
7 | 449 | 353 |
149 | 520 | 176 |
733 | |
| N. Ireland | 88 | 79
| 69 | 103 | 91
| 74 | 9,144 | 8,796
| 7,947 | 11,582 | 11,391
| 8,264 | |
| Total Investment |
| | |
| | | IDB Assistance (£ million)
| | | |
| |
| 93-94 | 94-95
| 95-96 | 96-97 |
97-98 | 98-99 | 93-94
| 94-95 | 95-96 |
96-97 | 97-98 | 98-99
| |
| Armagh | 4.8 | 0
| 0 | 0.9 | 0.0
| 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.3
| 0 | 0.1 | 0.0
| 0.5 | |
| Dungannon | 23.4 | 20.0
| 8.9 | 25.3 | 10.6
| 36.2 | 8.8 | 5.4
| 1.5 | 7.5 | 1.8
| 7.5 | |
| N. Ireland | 505.5 | 393.9
| 502.9 | 638.7 | 712.8
| 264.5 | 127.0 | 102.0
| 150.9 | 157.9 | 155.0
| 65.2 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
VISITS TO ARMAGH AND DUNGANNON DISTRICT COUNCIL AREAS
BY POTENTIAL INVESTORS
| 93-94 | 94-95
| 95-96 | 96-97 |
97-98 | 98-99 |
| Armagh | 0 | 1
| 1 | 4 | 2 |
2 |
| Dungannon | 12 | 13
| 9 | 4 | 3 |
1 |
| N. Ireland | 218 | 265
| 297 | 319 | 260
| 299 |
| | |
| | | |
Source: IDB Annual Report and Accounts 1998-99.
TSN POLICY
Targeting Social Need Policy was introduced in 1991 with
the aim of addressing disadvantage and to concentrate resources
on areas and people of greatest need. At the time, the Department
of Economic Development and its agencies marked their commitment
to the spirit of TSN by adopting a declaration of interest to
"Carry out their responsibilities in a way which effectively
targets those people and areas in greatest need with the effect
of reducing community differentials."
The application of Robson Indicators at a district level
as a measurement tool of deprivation negates Armagh's inclusion
as a Disadvantaged area at a district level. Indeed only 10 Councils,
Strabane, Cookstown, Omagh, Magherafelt, and Limavady are deemed
eligible.
Armagh City and District Council recognise that a combination
of criteria including technical (site specification) operational
(logistics) and personnel (labour market considerations) influence
the decision to locate and will vary in importance according to
the potential investor. However, the Council do believe the added
incentive of a higher ceiling assistance rate in a designated
District Council is a contributing factor in the choice of location
and indeed the reason attributable to the district's disappointing
track record. All other things being equal, Armagh is considered
a less favourable location compared to neighbouring districts
of Dungannon, and Newry and Mourne.
The application of this tool at district level ignores the
local social need. In a polarised community such as Armagh where
pockets of deprivation exist, it fails to have the effect of narrowing
economic differences between the two communities as well as reducing
disadvantage overall within the district.
Any intention to reduce community differential must be flexible
enough to operate at the level at which differentiation occurs.
It is evident that consideration of disadvantaged at district
level is inappropriate to targeting social need within districts.
People in disadvantaged areas are often poorly serviced by
public transport and by definition (as car ownership is one of
the Resource Base indicators of deprivation) less likely to own
or have access to a car. A number of other factors related to
poverty and marginalisation contribute to reduce the propensity
to travel to distant sites.
There is merit in locating business in or close to disadvantaged
areas provided this does actually impact on the disadvantaged
mainly through the creation of employment opportunity.
The higher the differential the less accurate the targeting,
eg factories in Dungannon in preference to Armagh do/expect to
recruit from the Armagh District. Given the lack of mobility of
people for reasons outlined above the impact is to increase community
differentials in the non-designated area.
An approach to Targeting Social Need is required which is
flexible and operates at an appropriate level to ensure that there
is the desired impact.
Armagh City and District Council would appreciate if the
Committee of Northern Ireland Affairs could take on board the
following recommendations to redress the issue:
Review of IDB TSN policy tool
IDB policy currently operates at a district level. Revisit
to the Robson Indicators used for assessment of deprivation and
transfer of policy application by IDB to ward level as adopted
by other agencies eg T & EA, thereby achieving greater policy
uniformity. This option is difficult. At a smaller scale, amendment
to the indicators to account for deprivation differentials which
exist between districts and recalculate using a suitable weighted
index may be more viable.
Impact Consideration for projects
As each investment project is considered on its own merit,
so too could its impact on disadvantaged people and areas, ie
its contribution to Targeting Social Need. Selective financial
assistance awarded by the IDB could be calculated on the basis
of a standard award plus an enhanced rate according to the potential
contribution of the project to Targeting Social Need. Using this
formula, more acute targeting would be achieved and the discrimination
against non-designated district with the resultant negative impact
would be avoided.
Partnership approach integrating social, economic and labour
market strategies
A partnership based approach along the lines of a "territorial
pact" whereby all of the actors involved in the promotion
of economic development co-ordinate their efforts to help strengthen
the economy and provide pathways to employment could provide a
means for Targeting Social Need at a local level. Through a pact,
a complementary linkage can be established between social, economic
and labour market strategies.
26 November 1999
|