Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons Second Report


Extract from original report

ANNEX A

"Programming of Legislation

We have explored the possibility of using arrangements for programming legislation which are more formal than the usual channels but more flexible than the guillotine. We believe that the spirit of these reforms requires co-operation from all sides of the House. We recommend to the House that, for a trial period, and in respect only of some bills, the House adopt an alternative approach as set out below:

    (i)  The Bills to be selected for programming during this trial period should be agreed through the usual channels, and should include some Bills of real substance, including at least one Bill against which the Opposition proposes to divide on Second Reading.

    (ii)  As soon as possible after formal presentation of such a Bill or its receipt from the House of Lords, discussions on a programme should take place between the usual channels, taking account of representations from all sides of the House, including backbenchers.

    (iii)  In the light of these discussions the Government should move an amendable programme motion directly after Second Reading, which could include:

      (a)  the Committee option to be followed

      (b)  the date by which the Bill should be reported from committee. The Committee itself would then decide how its time should be used to consider all sections of the bill within this timetable

      (c)  the amount of time proposed for Report Stage and Third Reading

      (d)  in defined circumstances, provisions for carry-over to a subsequent session.

    (iv)  The questions necessary to dispose of proceedings on a programme motion shall be put not later than 45 minutes after the commencement of such proceedings.

    (v)  The question on any subsequent motion to modify the original programme should be put forthwith, provided that a motion proposing to reduce the time agreed in the original programme motion or to bring forward the date for reporting the bill from committee should be treated as a programme motion.

    (vi)  A Bill subject to the terms of a programme motion shall not subsequently be made subject to an allocation of time motion in respect of those stages referred to in the programme motion.

    (vii)  For any such Bill committed to a Standing Committee or Special Standing Committee a programming sub-committee would be appointed by the Committee of Selection, to be chaired by the Chairman of the Standing Committee.

    (viii)  Programming sub-committees would have power to meet before the first meeting of the Committee to agree a programme for consideration of the Bill within the limits agreed by the House.

    (ix)  In drawing up a programme the sub-committee should take into account the need for all parts of the Bill to receive proper consideration and the rights of the Opposition and other parties and Members to be given adequate time to discuss matters to which they attach particular importance.

    (x)  Sufficient time should also be allowed in the programme for consultation with those outside Parliament.

    (xi)  The conclusions of the sub-committee should be embodied in a committee programming motion to be moved at the beginning of the first sitting, and proceedings on that motion should be concluded no later than one hour after it is moved, together with any amendments selected: the question on any subsequent such motions should be put forthwith.

    (xii)  The Chairman of a Standing Committee on a Bill subject to a programme should be given discretion to extend the time for debate on a particular Question for up to one hour where it appears to him or her to be necessary to ensure that all parts of the Bill are properly considered, within the overall limits agreed by the House."


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 6 July 2000