Annex 1
PRESS NOTICE 1130
MEACHER CONFIRMS INVESTMENT PROGRAMME
TO IMPROVE WATER ENVIRONMENT
Rivers and coastal waters are set to benefit from
an unprecedented investment programme by water companies, Environment
Minister Michael Meacher confirmed today.
After initial guidance to the nine water and
sewerage companies in England, issued in March, Michael Meacher
has now agreed the environmental requirements to be placed on
each of them for the next five years.
For seven of the companies (Anglian, Northumbrian,
North West, Severn Trent, Thames, Wessex and Yorkshire Water)
the Minister has confirmed his original guidance that their entire
agreed investment programmes should be completed by March 2005.
This means that all originally agreed works to protect and improve
over 3,400 kilometres of rivers and over 3,300 unsatisfactory
intermittent discharges and to upgrade coastal sewerage and sewage
treatment systems will now proceed. In the case of Southern Water,
nearly all of the agreed investment will be completed by March
2005, with the exception of a small part of the programme to improve
rivers which will now be completed by 2006.
A special case has been made for South West
Water, because of the size of their investment programme; the
level of bills compared with the rest of the country; and the
scale of the environmental requirements, particularly for coastal
sewage discharges. Michael Meacher has accepted that the investment
package which underlay the draft determination proposed by the
Director General of Water Services in July strikes the appropriate
balance between the pace of environmental improvements and the
burden on water bill payers.
Overall in England, almost 3,600 kilometres
of rivers will be protected and improved and 3,800 unsatisfactory
intermittent discharges will be tackled by March 2005.
Michael Meacher also confirmed the go-ahead
for 15 water quality improvements schemes whose costs and benefits
have been re-evaluated. These were part of 63 schemes held back
on the advice of the Director General for re-evaluation from an
overall package of over 550. Evaluation continues on the remaining
48.
Commenting on the overall package, Michael Meacher
said:
"This programme confirms my intention to
press ahead with an unprecedented water quality programme which
will make England's water whether for drinking, recreation,
or for the support of biodiversitycleaner and purer that
it was ever before."
The Minister was responding to a Written Question
from Colin Burgon MP, the text of which is attached.
NOTICES TO
EDITORS
1. The Director General of Water Services,
Ian Byatt, is currently engaged in a Periodic Review of water
company price limits in England and Wales between April 2000 and
March 2005. As part of the review, the Director General sought
guidance from Ministers on the environmental and drinking water
quality requirements to be placed on water companies during this
period. This is an essential element in establishing the size
and profile of companies' investment programmes and in turn enabling
the Director General to fulfil his statutory duty to set price
limits which enable the companies to finance the proper carrying
out of their functions.
2. In September 1998, the Government published
"Raising the Quality" which set the strategic
framework of environmental and quality standards for each of the
main areas of investment. In March of this year, the Environment
Agency and the Drinking Water Inspectorate published material
which had been endorsed by Ministers, setting out detailed requirements
for each company at the level of individual investment schemes.
In July, the Director General published draft price determinations
and set out the assumptions on which these were based, including
the size of the investment programme in each company.
3. The Director General of Water Services
will announce his final price determinations for the period 2000
to 2005 on Thursday 25 November.
PARLIAMENTARY QUESTION
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment,
Transport and the Regions, what further guidance he has given
the Director General of Water Services in the context of his Periodic
Review of water company price limits.
Michael Meacher
The Director General of Water Services, Ian
Byatt, is currently engaged in a Periodic Review of water company
price limits in England and Wales between April 2000 and March
2005. As part of the review, the Director General sought guidance
from Ministers on the environmental and drinking water quality
requirements to be placed on water companies during this period.
This is an essential element in establishing the extent of companies'
investment programmes and in turn enabling the Director General
to fulfil his statutory duty to set price limits which enable
the companies to finance the proper carrying out of their functions.
In September 1998, the Government published
"Raising the Quality" which set the strategic
framework of environmental and quality standards for each of the
main areas of investment. In March of this year, the Environment
Agency and the Drinking Water Inspectorate published material
which had been endorsed by Ministers, setting out detailed requirements
for each company at the level of individual investment schemes.
In July, the Director General published draft price determinations
and set out the assumptions on which these were based, including
the size of the investment programme in each company.
One area which has been the subject of subsequent
debate is the size and phasing of the environment programme. I
have looked again at the programmes of each of the nine large
water and sewerage companies in England. In the case of seven
of these companies (Anglian, Northumbrian, North West, Severn
Trent, Thames, Wessex and Yorkshire Water) I have reconfirmed
my original guidance that the entire agreed investment programme
should be completed by March 2005. This encompasses work on improving
rivers and unsatisfactory intermittent discharges and in upgrading
coastal sewerage and sewage treatment systems. For Southern Water,
I have again reconfirmed my earlier guidance that the agreed investment
programme should be completed by March 2005, save for a small
proportion of the programme to improve rivers.
The size of the investment programme for South
West Water deserves special consideration, given the level of
water bills in comparison to the remainder of the country and
the scale of the environmental requirements which are necessary
or desirable, particularly for coastal sewage discharges. I have
considered carefully the investment package which underlay the
draft determination proposed by the Director General and have
concluded that this strikes the appropriate balance between the
pace of environmental improvements and the burden on water bill
payers. I have also accepted the Director General's advice that
a large scheme proposed by Wessex Water, designed to address low
flow problems in the Hampshire Avon, deserves further study to
identify the most cost-effective solution. A scheme will need
to go ahead in the pricing period to address the environmental
problems, once the studies are complete.
I have asked the Director General, in his final
determinations, to phase the investment programmes sensibly, taking
into account my stated environmental priorities, such as the early
improvement of large continuous coastal sewage discharges, together
with schemes to benefit key bathing and shellfish waters, within
the constraints presented by the need to ensure efficient financing
and practical delivery. Further discussions will be necessary
between water companies and the Environment Agency before the
timings of individual schemes are finalised.
The Director General also identified 63 of over
550 schemes designed to improve the quality of rivers, which he
recommended should receive further study in terms of their costs
and benefits before they go ahead. The Environment Agency has
advised that for 14 of these schemes, the evidence suggests that
no investment is necessary during the pricing period, given the
current performance of the treatment works involved, while a significantly
less expensive option has already been identified for one more
scheme. On this basis I plan to instruct the Agency to take these
15 schemes forward. I intend to ask the Environment Agency to
explore in more detail the benefits of the remaining schemes and
to set them out in a way which will allow Ministers to judge these
against improved information on costs from Ofwat and the companies
concerned.
This programme confirms my intention to press
ahead with an unprecedented water quality programme which will
make England's waterwhether for drinking, recreation, or
for the support of biodiversitycleaner and purer than it
was ever before.
I have written to the Chairman of the Environment
Agency today with further details of the agreed environmental
improvement programme. A copy of my letter has been placed in
the Library of the House.
The Director General of Water Services will
announce his final price determinations for the period 2000 to
2005 on 25 November.
24 November 1999
|