DEFENCE SUPPORT
SMART PROCUREMENT
"We intend to continue
monitoring the achievements of Smart Procurement, both overall
and in connection with individual programmes, as the initiative
becomes bedded in. We expect future DPR to report details of its
achievements, whether they have already been realised or reflect
projected savings on future budgets." [HC158
paras 129-133]
56. It has always been the intention of the Smart
Procurement initiative that, following implementation, the revised
procedures and new behaviours would become fully embedded within
those organisations concerned with its operation. The Ministry
of Defence therefore expects reporting of its achievements to
become an intrinsic element of the formal Departmental, Defence
Procurement Agency and Defence Logistics Organisation reporting
mechanisms.
57. Given the establishment of Integrated Project
Teams (IPT) will have only just been completed by the end of this
financial year, the 1999/2000 Performance Report will necessarily
only be able to cover implementation progress and projected savings
on future budgets. Actual achievements will take time to materialise.
Work is being initiated to refine the methodology for tracking
performance in delivering benefits, and to embed reporting systems
that reflect Smart Procurement for each organisation, and the
Department as a whole.
CANCELLED EXERCISES
"The annual Royal
Marines Arctic warfare exercise in Norway ..................This
exercise must be reinstated next year."
"HMS Westminster's participation on the Flotex
exercise was cancelled, again as an in year budget management
measure and the ship was instead a feature of the New Millennium
celebrations on the Thames." [HC158
para 147]
58. The cancellation of the Royal Marine Winter
Deployment to Norway was taken against a background of increasing
numbers and scale of operational commitments, as well as the need
to live within the financial provision voted by Parliament. A
Winter Deployment for the Royal Marines is planned as part of
the Exercise Programme for 2000/01. The Cancellation of HMS Westminster's
participation on the Flotex exercise was unconnected with her
participation in the New Millenium celebrations on the Thames.
HMS Westminster would have taken part in this event irrespective
of the Flotex exercise as the two did not conflict.
"Given that so many
exercises had to be cancelled because of over-commitment it is
deeply worrying that there was insufficient money to pay for some
of even the residual exercises planned. Without regular exercises
for high intensity conflict, standards in our Armed Forces will
plummet, whatever the quality of the people and equipment."
[HC158 para 147]
59. The Government does not recognise the description
of the last year. Whilst it is true that a number of exercises
had to be cancelled due to operational pressures and some for
financial pressures, a large proportion of the exercise programme
was completed as planned, and was described in paragraphs 18-19
and Annex H of the 1998/1999 Departmental Performance Report.
The Armed Forces took part in a wide range of multinational and
national exercises to prepare themselves for both war and non-warfighting
situations. Indeed it is the skills that the Armed Forces learn
in such training and exercises that have been honed in Operations
during this very busy period. Earlier in its report the Committee
refers to the UK's Armed Forces as "amongst the best in the
world", that they remain so highly regarded is due, in part,
to the high importance that the Ministry of Defence places on
training and exercises. Our Armed Forces are trained and equipped
for high intensity warfighting which experience has shown allows
them to conduct operations successfully across the whole spectrum
of scenarios.
DERA PPP
"We take this opportunity,
however, to repeat our call for the Department to abandon its
plans and for the proposed £250m funding to be added to the
baseline in the Spending Review now getting underway." [HC158
para 154-157]
60. The Strategic Defence Review made a clear
commitment to explore PPP opportunities for DERA in order to optimise
its ability to continue to provide a scientific and technical
capability to MOD. The specific objectives required to be met
in developing a suitable PPP solution include:
- Capability: to find a solution that ensures the
continuing availability to MOD of the scientific and technical
capability required to support UK defence needs.
- Financial: to ensure long term value for money
for MOD and the taxpayer.
- Wider Issues: to address wider UK needs, in particular
those of DERA's other Government department customers. To provide
a solution compatible with MOD and wider Government policy on
science, defence research, Smart Procurement, defence diversification
and relationships with Allies.
61. Set against this background a PPP structure
will meet the strategic needs of DERA enabling it to develop and
enhance its world class scientific and research capabilities.
The introduction of private sector disciplines and the ability
to use capital more flexibly and to explore commercial opportunities
will also give DERA significant advantages over its current status.
62. For planning purposes it has been assumed
that the DERA PPP will generate a receipt for the Exchequer and
that an element of this will form a credit to the defence budget.
The size of any receipt will depend on the actual PPP option chosen
and no final decision on this has yet been made.
63. Whatever solution is selected it must be
capable of strengthening DERA's ability to continue to provide
world class scientific research and allow it to be a flexible
and responsive organisation, whilst at the same time preserving
our essential defence interests and maintaining our valuable collaborative
relationships.
EFFICIENCY PROGRAMME
"There is, it seems
to us, a fundamental implausibility in the total efficiency claimed
by the MoD over the years."
"....we will want to collect information
on all of the higher value efficiency measures claimed, and then
to examine more closely a selection of case studies. We cannot
be expected to believe the MoD's assurances that these measures
are genuine efficiency savings, and not cuts, until it produces
this evidence. A year on year programme of efficiency savings
can have a debilitating effect at all levels of command, and can
be destructive to the quality of life that will sustain retention
in the Armed Forces." [HC158 paras
158-160]
64. The Government notes the Committee's wish
to examine the Department's efficiency programme in more detail.
The Ministry of Defence has recently provided details of 101 efficiency
measures and a copy of its efficiency instructions, which it hopes
will help to reassure the Committee. The Department is happy to
engage in a further dialogue on this issue. On a separate point,
paragraph 158 of the committee's report contains a slight error;
the efficiency target for this year (1999/00) is £475m and
not £525m as stated, which represents our current forecast.
"Overall, we conclude
that the condition of the Defence Budget is sufficiently poor
to give rise to concern. The cumulative evidence of cancelled
exercises, delayed equipment programmes and of resources apparently
insufficient to reverse the problems of overstretch and undermanning
suggest that if the wheels have not yet come off the SDR, they
are certainly beginning to wobble alarmingly. The Department's
finances should be re-balanced in the current spending review.
Commitments and resources have to be brought back into line, or
we risk finding ourselves stumbling from one crisis to the next."
[HC158 para 161]
65. It is the nature of defence that there are
always things on which more money can be spent. The Department's
task is to maximise defence capability within a reasonable share
of public sector spending as a whole. The Ministry of Defence
believes that the Department has done that in the SDR and as a
result the Department has a better balanced and focused defence
programme. The SDR programme is deliverable, although some of
the improvements it envisaged will take time to deliver.
66. Spending plans for the Department out to
2004 are being considered as part of this year's Spending Review.
It is obviously too early to speculate on the outcome at this
stage.
|