H. CONCLUSION
57. A number of respondents to the draft Bill
commented that the measures it contained were improved on those
included in the "Building Confidence in Electronic Commerce"
paper.[163]
We agree and we believe this demonstrates the importance and effectiveness
of the thorough scrutiny of proposals brought forward by Government,
by Parliament through this Committee and by those
affected. Not only have the most contentious aspects of the Government's
proposals such as the "rebuttable presumption"
and the statutory licensing scheme for TSPs been dropped,
but crucial minor amendments for instance to the tipping-off
offence have been accepted. The Government published
a draft Bill not because it wanted to subject its cryptography
policy to further scrutiny but because of self-inflicted parliamentary
time constraints. Our study shows, however, that it was
fortunate that they felt obliged to do so, and that the Bill will
be the better for it once presented. In broad terms we hope that
this Bill, already announced in the 1998 Queen's Speech, will
reach the statute book without undue delay.
163 Responses to Government from Skygate Technology,
British Computer Society p1, Dell p1, International Underwriting
Association p1, British Phonographic Industry paragraph 6.1, Interforum
p1, British Telecommunications section 1, Association of Certified
Chartered Accountants; also Interactive Media in Retail Group
and Thus Ltd p1; EURIM p1 described the draft Bill as a "good
basis on which to build"; there remained critical comments,
however, for instance from Kaltons, the Internet Service Providers'
Association p1 and the Institute for the Management of Information
Systems paragraph 3 Back
|