Select Committee on Trade and Industry Fourteenth Report


  H. CONCLUSION

  57. A number of respondents to the draft Bill commented that the measures it contained were improved on those included in the "Building Confidence in Electronic Commerce" paper.[163] We agree and we believe this demonstrates the importance and effectiveness of the thorough scrutiny of proposals brought forward by Government, by Parliament — through this Committee — and by those affected. Not only have the most contentious aspects of the Government's proposals — such as the "rebuttable presumption" and the statutory licensing scheme for TSPs — been dropped, but crucial minor amendments — for instance to the tipping-off offence — have been accepted. The Government published a draft Bill not because it wanted to subject its cryptography policy to further scrutiny but because of self-inflicted parliamentary time constraints. Our study shows, however, that it was fortunate that they felt obliged to do so, and that the Bill will be the better for it once presented. In broad terms we hope that this Bill, already announced in the 1998 Queen's Speech, will reach the statute book without undue delay.


163   Responses to Government from Skygate Technology, British Computer Society p1, Dell p1, International Underwriting Association p1, British Phonographic Industry paragraph 6.1, Interforum p1, British Telecommunications section 1, Association of Certified Chartered Accountants; also Interactive Media in Retail Group and Thus Ltd p1; EURIM p1 described the draft Bill as a "good basis on which to build"; there remained critical comments, however, for instance from Kaltons, the Internet Service Providers' Association p1 and the Institute for the Management of Information Systems paragraph 3 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1999
Prepared 3 November 1999