Examination of witnesses
(Questions 1240 - 1243)
WEDNESDAY 24 FEBRUARY 1999
RT HON
STEPHEN BYERS, MP
and MR JOHN
BATTLE, MP
Mr Beard
1240. We heard from both British Aerospace and
Hewlett Packard that they were having difficulty in recruiting
qualified engineers in Britain. My question is, what is being
done to ensure the supply of engineers and what is being done
to predict the future demands?
(Rt Hon Stephen Byers) Well there is work going on,
as you may be aware, in the Engineering Councils to promote engineering
as a profession for people to go into. I have to sayand
this goes back to my days when I was Minister for School StandardsI
think it does go right back to what goes on in the classroom and
it is promoting engineering as something that is exciting, which
is new, which is modern and that is the way in. It is as simple
as that and it will need to be started actually in the school
if we are going to be successful. There is no doubt if we do not
tackle it and I know there are steps being taken by my colleagues
in the Department for Education and Employment, particularly in
terms of encouraging people to think about engineering in a positive
way. We need to do that because there is no doubt that if one
looks in the years ahead then there will be a problem which will
arise and which we will need to address.
Dr Gibson
1241. You mentioned in fact that you thought
there was a shift amongst academics. I have my doubts about that.
I think there is still an ideology amongst academics that four
papers in Nature to help float the research exercise is more important
than setting up a spin-out company. And the other thing is that
there is an agonizing exercise going on in looking at cost accountancy
within universities, value for money stuff, and there is a suspicion
that that is being linked to more selectivity in some subtle way
and that will mean that the research exercise is important in
getting selective units and they will get more money and so on
and that is what is important, not spin-out companies, in these
extremely bright people's heads. They are getting different messages.
Spin out, but also get four papers and make sure your Department
keeps its basic money. How are you going to handle that paradox
in their heads?
(Rt Hon Stephen Byers) I think it probably varies
from university department to university department. I think there
are some areas where the need to apply your research is well regarded
and has happened over the years and people can see that as being
a very positive spin off from the work they do. There are no doubt
other areas where people see that the research they are doing
is linked into the academic world and that is it. I think Members
will know that there is a review going on at the moment which
is looking at the whole area of how we can target money that we
are providing in a way which will be supportive of the application
of ideas and we are doing it, as I said earlier, through the various
sums of money that we have targeted. I think it is the Government
needing to encourage and saying: "This is something that
we want to happen". We can encourage it through additional
funds being made available. What we cannot do and what we should
not do is to at all times compel people in higher education, say
it is a requirement that you have to apply the work that you are
doing into the commercial sector. I would not approve of that,
but I think what we should be saying is that actually there is
worthwhile work here, that you should be engaged in. If you are
exposed to it and you think "Yes, this is something which
appeals which is attractive" I think that is the way to do
it. Certainly in the discussions I have had with people from higher
education who actually have got engaged in the sort of wider application
of the work they have been involved in, they get a great deal
of personal pleasure from it. Certainly from my days of being
an academic I must say that writing a 5,000 word academic article
was not always that motivating an experience.
1242. You think there is going to be more selectivity
though, do you?
(Rt Hon Stephen Byers) Well there is already quite
a lot of selectivity because I think the figures that I remember
show that I think 70 per cent of the dual funding goes into just
30 universities.
1243. And is that going to change?
(Rt Hon Stephen Byers) There are no plans at the moment
to change it.
Chairman: Secretary of State, I have
tried to keep it to half past five and we have overrun by three
minutes. I hope you will forgive us. Mr Battle, may I thank you
for coming along this afternoon. Secretary of State we are most
grateful to you. I have a feeling that we have failed a little
bit this afternoon. You said at the beginning that all the hard
questions would be passed to Mr Battle. Since you took 70 per
cent of the questions yourself I feel we have been asking too
easy ones! This was not our intention. Thank you very much indeed
for the time you spent with us and the help you have given us
with our inquiry. We are most grateful.
|