Memorandum by The Royal College of Nursing
of the United Kingdom
FUTURE NHS STAFFING (SR 19)
Nurses working harder than ever
Three in five nurses are working in extra hours
on top of their main job5.
Half of nurses now feel under too much pressure
at work5.
More than half feel their workloads are too
heavy5.
The Audit Commission has reported that it costs
£5,000 to recruit a nurse11.
NHS employers in England spent £192 million
on agency nurses, and £41 million on recruitment advertising12.
The quality of workforce data collected
The reliability of workforce information varies
considerably at trust level. It is hindered by the deficiencies
of some of the computer databases which are basically payrolls
with additional human resource data records. This means that some
trusts, for example, are unable to separate out paediatric nurses
from registered general nurses (RGNs), or enrolled nurses working
at D grade from RGNs, as they may be on the same pay scales. This
problem has been resolved in most cases by using occupational
codes to identify such staff. In a few instances, trusts have
been unable to provide accurate staff-in-post information.
The better consortia address these issues be
raising the profile of workforce planning through the running
of workshops and by making senior consortia members accountable
for the delivery of timely and accurate workforce plans. This
gives the consortia enough time to evaluate the overall credibility
of plans. In addition, the consortia commission surveys of the
private sector, using projections based on past trends and the
input private sector managers were willing to make on their future
demand. The latter are much more guarded than their NHS colleagues
about their plans, as they are concerned about commercial sensitivity.
There are a range of criticisms that can be levelled
at the current arrangements for planning education and training
They do not always relate to the annual trust
plans, involving line managers in some duplication and wasted
effort. Trust plans have typically been for only one year ahead,
a result of the contracting regime. Trusts are now encouraged
to plan further ahead, and include five year plans.
Trusts tend to concentrate on service developments
setting out the appointment of new consultants, often without
estimating the impact on staff and services to support them, resulting
in additional pressure on nurses and other staff. Trust plans
tend to lack detail, so, for instance, they may set out the need
to make savings of £3 million without setting out how such
savings are to be achieved.
The trust planning cycle is also out of step
with education and training, with the former taking place in September
and October and the latter occurring in April and May. This has
led some consortia to seek to harmonise their planning arrangements.
A further criticism of current planning is that
it focuses on staff groups, although patient care is managed on
a care group or clinical directorate basis.
These problems are recognised in the Education
and Training Planning Guidance of October 1997, which calls for
workforce planning that is integral to service planning, and crosses
health and social care boundaries and crosses professional and
vocational boundaries.
It may be the case that, in future, consortia
move towards an approach where planning is based on care groups,
such as elderly people, mental health or children's services.
This will provide a substantial undertaking and will require very
detailed information on staff not only by qualification but area
of work. It will be particularly difficult where staff groups
divide their time between a variety of care groups. For instance,
RGNs might work in care of the elderly or gynaecology. In addition,
comparable information would be required from other care providers.
A natural consequence of planning by care group
will be to encourage health care providers to think about extending
staff roles and reducing the types of professionals and profession-specific
support staff involved. This is a long term process that can only
be properly addressed through shifts in the education system and
changes to the curricula. The likely effect will be the development
of more multi-professional post registration courses and greater
support for lifelong learning and continuous professional development.
The RCN believes that national workforce planning
is vital, with due attention to the multi-disciplinary needs of
the health service. The following modifications are needed:
There must be greater and more open dialogue
between the consortia (who purchase education) and the universities
(who provide it). It many cases relationships are still at an
immature stage. Employers have only limited understanding of some
cultural aspects of higher education, while universities do not
always recognise employers legitimate concerns.
Accurate workforce planning must take full account
of the competition from the independent sector for nurses.
While many of the key decision makers on education
consortia are from a nursing background, there is no explicit
recognition that nurses and other professionals are key to the
process of planning the healthcare workforce. The RCN believes
that nursing must be represented on all consortia.
Local planning must be tempered by a UK-wide
overview of supply and demand. Many nurses move across regions,
and across country borders on qualification or subsequently. While
there are some minimal checks and balances within England there
is no UK wide perspective.
The RCN began to predict the current shortage
of registered nurses in the early 1990s, but was met with blank
stares and denials by the Department of Health and employers organisations.
Workforce planning decisions at local, country and UK level, and
the data which underpin these, should be available for public
scrutiny regularly and as a matter of course.
V. REVIEWING
THE BREADTH
AND SCOPE
OF NURSE
EDUCATION
During the past 20 years there have been dramatic
changes, both in educational attainment of school leavers, and
in the requirements for admission to universities. More than half
of all entrants to higher education are now not the traditional
18 year old school leavers. For instance, the average age of a
student nurse is 26. Female participation on the workforce and
in higher education has expanded massively. Students want degrees,
and the parents of students want their children to have degrees.
Nurses are now amongst the few health care professionals
who are not wholly prepared at first degree level. It would be
surprising if this difference were not reflected in the way in
which nurses perform and are viewed by others. The RCN believes
that, over the next 10 years, the profession should move towards
the position where pre-registration nursing education should lead
to registration as a nurse and the award of a first degree. We
argue that such a move is both desirable for reasons of patient
care, and inevitable if nursing is to emerge once again as a desirable
profession. The Government's recent emphasis on widening the entry
gates to nursing, including bursaries for enrolled nurses to retrain
and return to the NHS, special bursaries for existing NHS staff,
such as health care assistants, to enable them to train as nurses,
and more part-time pre-registration nursing and midwifery courses
are particularly welcome. The RCN believes that a greater emphasis
on NVQ level entry to nurse education, coupled with fast-tracking
for experienced health care staff, could also give wider access
to nursing as a career.
Lifelong learning
The RCN endorses the view that quality patient
care is underpinned by a process of lifelong learning.A First
Class Service rightly recognises the role of lifelong learning
in creating the culture needed to improve quality in the new NHS.
However, it is important to highlight the distinction between
lifelong learning and continuing professional development.
Lifelong learning is not something that can
simply be put in place or given to NHS staff. The RCN Institute
defines lifelong learning as follows:
"a journey throughout a person's
life, during which learning occurs and knowledge, skills and attitudes
are gained, as a result of both formal and informal educational
opportunities and experience. Lifelong learning, for practitioners,
is set within the context of their profession, their workplace
and employer, their patient/client relationships and society.
The learning can, therefore, be affected by these factors and
can bring influence to bear on them".
Continuing professional development
Continuing Professional Development (CPD) is
set within a lifelong learning approach but is more specific and
purposeful. The values on which it is based include:
equality of opportunity
the importance of self-fulfilment
responsibility for self
valuing what other learners can teach
an enquiring mind, able to think
critically
facilitation . . . rather than dictation.
Access to CPD is a pre-requisite for all health
professionals and should be available on an equitable basis. Currently
this is not the case. Nurses frequently have to fund their own
CPD activity and participate in their free time. A 1997 Institute
of Employment Studies7 survey of how nurses meet their Post Registration
and Practice (PREP) requirements indicated that only 35 per cent
of NHS staff were allowed time off work for private study and
32 per cent received financial support for study.
The RCN sees the lack of a national financial
framework to underpin CPD for nurses is a major barrier to quality
improvement throughout the NHS. Without this commitment, there
is a danger of the Government promoting CPD rhetoric rather than
reality.
REFERENCES
1 Working Together: securing a quality workforce
for the NHS launched by Health Minister Alan Milburn at the
Association of Healthcare Human Resource Management conference,
23 September 1998
2 The New NHS: Modern, Dependable. HMSO
Cm 3870. Dec. 1997
Designed to Care: Renewing the NHS in Scotland.
Scottish Office Department of Health HMSO Cm 3811. December 1997
NHS Wales: Putting patients first.
Welsh Office. HMSO Cm 3841. January 1998.
Fit for the future: A consultation document on
the Government's proposals for the future of the Health and Personal
Social Services in Northern Ireland. DHSS,
Northern Ireland. May 1998.
Our Healthier Nation Cm
3852
A First Class Service: Quality in the New NHS
3 UKCC Annual Statistical Report, 1997-98. UKCC,
London.
4 English National Board Annual Report, 1997.
ENB London.
5 Changing Times: a survey of registered
nurses in 1998. Smith G and Seccombe I. Institute for Employment
Studies, Brighton.
6 Pay and Progression for Graduates 1997-98.
Incomes Data Services Management Pay Review Research File 45.
IDS, February 1998.
7 Taking Part: Registered Nurses and the
Labour Market in 1997. Smith G and Seccombe I. Institute for
Employment Studies, Brighton.
8 Pay Review Body Report for Nursing Staff,
Midwives and Health Visitors, 1998.
9 Department of Health Statistical Bulletin:
NHS non-medical workforce in England. Department of Health,
1998.
10 Department of Health Statistical Bulletin:
Private hospitals and nursing homes. Department of Health,
1998.
11 Audit Commission 1997, Finders, Keepers:
the Management of Staff Turnover in NHS Trusts.
12 Department of Health analysis of NHS Trusts
Financial Returns.
|