Examination of witnesses
(Questions 120 - 139)
TUESDAY 8 DECEMBER 1998
MR DAVID
O'DOWD, CBE, QPM and MR
KEITH POVEY,
QPM
120. There have been very recent reports arising
from allegations of corruption that this matter has been dealt
with in a more effective way by undercover agents to try to root
out this poison in the police. Do you have much confidence in
that?
(Mr O'Dowd) We have found corruption to arise mainly
in inner city and urban areas. That is where the greatest potential
arises in terms of drug and related criminality. For those forces
that have adopted that tactical option it is proving to be very
successful. Therefore I support that. With that and other methods
they are the only means of getting to grips with this problem
and rooting it out. I support the efforts that have been taken
by those forces that have created undercover squads to deal with
it. But I can assure you that not every force in the country has
such a unit or, on the face of it, needs one.
(Mr Povey) We should not underestimate the success
that the service is having in that regard. For every corrupt officer
who is identified, charged and prosecuted a number of other officers
are pursuing it. There is a success story there as well.
(Mr O'Dowd) There will also be moves on the disciplinary
front which the chairman has been instrumental in introducing.
That is having an important impact in tackling this problem. We
are very grateful for that.
121. In your view is the problem the same as
or worse than in the `seventies when effective action was taken
by the then Commissioner to root out corrupt officers?
(Mr O'Dowd) I believe that today it is different in
scale and depth. It is no longer a £5 backhander but hundreds
of thousands of pounds being offered. Allegations are madebut
very fewthat officers have been involved in criminal activity
to an extent that is quite disturbing. I think that of great concern
today is the scale of it.
122. This committee has examined police disciplinary
procedures and made recommendations upon them. There are to be
changes from April of next year. How far are you satisfied that
this will be sufficient to give chief constables and the Commissioner
the powers that they need to deal with other sources of misbehaviour
apart from corruption?
(Mr O'Dowd) I believe that it will be very effective.
Indeed, apart from one element with which they are unhappy the
staff associations have signed up to almost all the recommendations.
They have been alongside ACPO in working through them and agreeing
them. The one aspect with which they are unhappy is fast-tracking.
They are not concerned about the principle but the method of dealing
with people who are deemed to be involved in crime where the evidence
is overwhelming and it is in the public interest that they should
be removed as quickly as possible. They are concerned about due
process in those cases and firmly believe the evidence should
be tested. That apart, they are fully signed up to the recommendations.
I believe that it will make a great impact on the problems in
this arena that have hitherto been raised through the chairman.
123. Will the Police Federation be taken on
board in support of what is being done?
(Mr O'Dowd) Yes. Except for one area with which there
is a feeling of discomfort I believe that they will sign up to
the rest. The one exception is fast-tracking[1]
which is focused on the minority of people who need to be got
out of the job straight away, not just kept on for a long period
of time either on sick leave or whatever where the evidence as
to their criminality is from the outset overwhelming.
124. Every honest police officer wants to see
effective action taken on corruption and misbehaviour?
(Mr O'Dowd) Yesand the staff officers are fully
behind that comment.
125. Medical retirement seems to have been the
subject of a good deal of abuse. Although the percentage is coming
down I understand that the overall figure for 1997/98 stands at
38 per cent. Undoubtedly, some cases in that category are genuine
but others are not. Do you have any comments to make on that matter?
(Mr O'Dowd) We have a whole book full of comments
we made in our report on Lost Time which has focused the attention
of chiefs and the staff associations over the past 12 months.
You will know that it has run to as high as 59 per cent (on average).
It came down substantially. What concerned us was the range. If
I identify 1996/97 (referring to page 94 of the 1997/8 HMCIC Annual
report), how can it be that the range is from 16 to 77 per cent?
In some of those forces one sees that they have reduced their
ill-health and medical retirement figures by 24 and 28 per cent
respectively. It is a tricky matter. There should always be genuine
medical retirement for the officer who faces a tough job at the
front line. Surprisingly, we found that it was a management problem
and that it was not being managed effectively and it was not always
a question of people taking advantage of the system. The other
difficulty is that there is no honourable exit. When a person
loses his vocation or has had enough for whatever reason the only
way is to soldier on or go for medical retirement, if he or she
is so inclined. We have firmly recommended that there should be
an honourable exit, that people can move out and take their pension
contributions with them and not try to stay on or abuse the system
or take advantage of it. There are some associated regulatory
aspects to the medical and personnel side of the process that
are being looked at but I shall not go into them. The bottom line
is that it was not being managed very effectively.
126. Lay people like ourselves obviously have
nowhere near the knowledge that you have of the police force.
However, no one can dispute the strains under which officers work,
but another aspect of canteen culture has grown up in which this
type of abuse has developed to such an extent that it has become
quite a major problem?
(Mr O'Dowd) That is so. You use the word "abuse".
The staff associations would take offence at that. They say that
it is not abuse but a management problem. It almost becomes a
matter of system. At 26Ö years which is the time to peak
for medical retirement for index-linking the graph shows quite
a rise, which is perhaps not by chance alone. But they are the
options available and it was not being properly managed in a number
of areas. There was abuse in a number of areas including discipline
cases. People who had committed very serious offences went sick.
That is a matter which this committee has dealt with very effectively
in a different area. There was abuse of the system but it was
not being managed. It has been shown that some forces in one year
have reduced it by 10 to 20 per cent. It is not just a case of
managing it in a more vigorous way; it is a matter of considering
the role of the occupational health units. Some people can be
put back to work by rehabilitative duties and good physiotherapy.
In some forces that was not always available. In some forces there
has been quite a sea change in providing good occupational help
and support to officers to put them back to work, not just to
let them leave the service which means that one loses the investment
in their careers.
127. You spoke about the weakness of management.
It has been pretty long standing. Why has it taken so long to
deal with given that the urgency of the situation is very much
in the public domain?
(Mr O'Dowd) There have been major concerns expressed
by the Commissioner and other chief constables about the perceived
ineffectiveness of the police disciplinary system. Before 1995
it did not really matter to the same extent because it fell under
the line in county council budgets. Therefore, whatever the cost
of pensions it was picked up through the treasurer and the county
council. Once the new financial arrangements came in it came above
the line. Chief constables then realised that this was costing
a fortune and started to think how to bring down the figure. It
was at about that time that we started our work to demonstrate
that a lot more could be done in that direction.
Chairman
128. To go back to corruption for one moment,
one aspect is what is known as "noble cause" corruption.
Someone connected with the Police Federation once said to me that
there was nothing wrong with perjury committed by an honest officer
in pursuit of a good cause. That idea has been around for some
years, although I understand there has been an attempt to clamp
down on it recently?
(Mr O'Dowd) Sir Paul coined the expression a number
of years ago. It lies at the heart of integrity and it is criminal.
In no way do I support it. One of the problems for officers is
the performance regime in which they find themselves. They may
say that if they are being pushed on detection they will go for
domestic violence and other matters and that will help with the
figures. But it goes to the heart of integrity. For that reason
one needs sound audit to ensure that one eradicates that kind
of behaviour.
129. One of the difficulties is that when some
years down the line a person is caught out, whether it is perjury,
perverting the course of justice and so on, there do not appear
to be many consequences.
(Mr O'Dowd) That may well be the case for different
reasons. They should be followed through. Often the person has
retired from the service and so discipline is out of the window.
But if there are criminal charges that can be provedI take
by example the Guildford and West Midlands casesit is a
matter for the investigating officer to pursue it vigorously to
see where they can be sustained. It is for the Crown Prosecution
Service to decide whether in the public interest there is sufficient
evidence to pursue the matter. All I can say is that perhaps the
evidence has not been forthcoming.
130. Or perhaps the Crown Prosecution Service
has not been as vigorous as it should be?
(Mr O'Dowd) That may well be the case.
131. Do you think it is possible?
(Mr O'Dowd) I cannot answer that because I do not
know what the balance of evidence has been. I know that John Stevens
in the Met and those in other forces take the view that if they
have bad officers and the necessary evidence is available they
will press the CPS to test those cases in court. Sometimes they
are disappointed that the matter has not proceeded through the
judicial process. It is as relevant now as it is with past cases.
132. Perhaps this is a potential subject for
one of your thematic inquiries. I think I am right in saying that
in just about every one of the major miscarriages of justice of
which I am aware no police officer, or anyone who has been responsible
in any way, whether it be forensic scientists or others, has ever
suffered more than mild inconvenience as a result?
(Mr O'Dowd) My memory tells me that there were some
problems in relation to some forensic science reports, but I am
not sure whether they have resulted in prosecutions.
133. There has never been a prosecution. That
breeds a culture of impunity?
(Mr O'Dowd) Yes. But at the end of the day one comes
back to the sufficiency of evidence.
134. One of the problems is that to the layman
there does appear to be evidence. There has been another big case
involving Devon and Cornwall. That is still subject to appeal.
However, if what is alleged to have happened is found to have
happened no consequences will follow, and that is after years
of prevarication. That creates a serious problem.
(Mr O'Dowd) I accept your proposition that it creates
a problem. But at the end of the day has the investigating officer
tried rigorously to find evidence to substantiate the allegation
in order to lay criminal charges against the officer? If he has
put that case before the CPSit is not passing the buckand
it decides that there is an insufficiency of evidence it may not
bode well for public perception but the matter cannot be taken
any further.
135. I understand that the CPS has a role to
play in this. But nought out of quite a large number is very damaging?
(Mr O'Dowd) Yes.
Mr Winnick
136. Obviously, you are not a prosecuting authority.
But is there is a feeling that to prosecute such officers will
bring about a further loss of confidence in the Police Service
and therefore there is an inbuilt bias not to take legal action
against such people?
(Mr O'Dowd) I would hope not, and I do not think that
that would be in the Crown Prosecution Service's code of practice.
It is a matter of public interest and sufficiency of evidence.
There used to be the 51-49 rule as to whether a criminal charge
would be forthcoming but I would not like to think that that was
the reason for not taking high profile cases of this nature before
the court.
137. But as far as your organisation is concerned
if the evidence is there you believe that there should be a prosecution
which would enhance the integrity of the Police Service about
which you are concerned?
(Mr O'Dowd) Yes.
Mr Singh
138. As to corrupt officers, I do not want to
exaggerate the problem out of all proportion but I heard you say
that there were 200 cases nationally. On 27 November the Guardian
reported that in the Met 70 officers had either been charged or
suspended. On 30 November it was reported that 46 officers from
Middlesbrough were under investigation and had been suspended.
That makes a total of 116 in three days. I challenge your assertion
that there are only 200 cases throughout the 43 forces in the
country.
(Mr O'Dowd) When I did my work I asked every force
about all the investigations under way at that particular time.
If one adds them up they come to just over 200. I know where the
major seats are, but it is probably not fair to go into them now.
That was what I was told.
Mr Russell
139. To put the matter into perspective, what
is the total number of serving police officers?
(Mr O'Dowd) There are 126,000.
Chairman: On that note we conclude the hearing.
Thank you very much.
1 Note by witness: Where the Federation's view
(like the Superintendents) is that the evidence should be tested. Back
|