Annex
Extract from a letter to the Clerk of
the Committee from the Permanent Under-Secretary of State, Home
Office
I undertook to come back to the Committee on
the following points:
DATE AND
CONFIRMATION OF
AMOUNT OF
INVESTMENT FOR
THE JOINT
EMERGENCY CONTROL
ROOM PILOTS
(Q25)
In January this year, the Department of Health
was allocated £7.8 million from the Invest to Save Budget
to conduct a series of projects evaluating joint control rooms
for the police, fire and ambulance services. This was supported
by the Home Office and the Department of the Environment, Transport
and the Regions. The emergency services and the coastguard were
invited on 12 March to submit outline joint proposals. After an
initial sift, full business cases were invited and received from
services in four areas and assessed by a project steering group
representing the Home Office, Department of Health and other stakeholders.
Lady Hayman announced the successful pilots (Cleveland, Gloucestershire
and Wiltshire) on 3 July at the ambulance services annual conference
in Harrogate. Work on setting up the schemes has begun and they
will be closely monitored and evaluated over the coming three
years.
CASES WHERE
FIRE AUTHORITIES
HAVE BEEN
SUED BY
PROPERTY OWNERS
(Q44)
Two other cases were dealt with at the same
time as the Digital case. These were John Munroe (Acrylics)
Ltd v London Fire and Civil Defence Authority and others and
the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter Day Saints (Great
Britain) v West Yorkshire Fire and Civil Defence Authority.
In the Digital case, the High Court found that
the Hampshire Brigade had been negligent in deciding to switch
off the sprinkler system at a building leased by Digital and damages
were awarded against the County Council. The Court of Appeal considered
the Digital judgement with two other cases referred to above.
It held that while, for the purpose of extinguishing fires, the
powers of the members of a fire brigade were very extensive, there
was nothing in legislation which permitted them to be exercised
negligently. However, a high threshold had to be crossed to establish
negligence: the error must be one that no reasonably well-informed
and competent firefighter could have made. The Court of Appeal
upheld the judgement in the Digital case, while finding for the
fire authority in the other cases.
The circumstances of the Digital judgement were
considered by the Central Fire Brigades Advisory Council for England
and Wales on the basis of the paper attached (annex A[21]*.)
The Advisory Council decided that the case did not justify seeking
blanket immunity for fire authorities from legal actions for negligence.
BREAKDOWN OF
CATEGORIES OF
CASES IN
IND'S BACKLOG
(Q46)
The backlog figure discussed by the Committee
(125,165) was that cited by the Secretary of State when he appeared
before the Committee in April. It excludes nationality cases.
The following table updates the figures at the end of June:
| June 1999 |
| Asylum | 80,000 |
| General & Settlement | 38,000
|
| European | 4,000 |
| Illegal Entry/Deportation | 18,000
|
| Nationality | 101,000 |
| Total backlog | 241,000 |
| |
COMPENSATION PAYMENTS
THIS YEAR
BY UKPA (Q122)
In the 1999 calendar year to the end of June, around £50,000
has been paid in compensation, covering 1,409 claims. Average
payment made is £36.
Included in the above are 132 claims made, paid or expected
in respect of missed travel dates. The average payment for these
claims is £270.
WHEN WE
FIRST BECAME
AWARE THAT
THERE WOULD
BE A
CRISIS IN
UKPA (Q138)
The Passport Agency introduced a new passport issuing system
on 5 October 1998 in the Liverpool Regional Office on a pilot
basis and in the Newport Office as an extended pilot some six
weeks later. These pilots revealed some problems with the new
system, particularly in relation to work throughput both by Agency
staff and the private sector partner Siemens Business Services.
Because of the problems, the Project Steering Committee decided
on 18 November 1998 to defer rollout of the planned system to
the remaining offices. At that stage, performance, although not
at planned levels of throughput, was expected to improve by early
in 1999.
In his next Quarterly Report, on 2 February 1999, the Chief
Executive informed Ministers of some of the problems being experienced
in Liverpool and Newport and deferral of the full rollout. Ministers
raised various questions about backlogs and the failure to answer
telephone calls. The Chief Executive responded on 25 February
with a fuller explanation of the problems and how they were being
addressed. He provided reassurances that problems were temporary
and expressed the hope that full production would be restored
by early summer. On 26 February the UKPA branch of the Public
and Commercial Services union raised their concerns about relaxation
of security checks and the Siemens contract problems in a letter
to Mr O'Brien. Having read the letter on 3 March, Mr O'Brien asked
for a meeting with the Chief Executive and the Unions. He also
asked for briefing from the Chief Executive. On 5 March, the Chairman
of the Advisory Board minuted Mr O'Brien referring to the deferral
of the roll out and the steps the Agency was taking to deal with
them. He suggested a meeting with the Chief Executive. On 15 March
Mr O'Brien met the Unions and the Chief Executive. Following the
meeting, Mr O'Brien expressed serious concern at the developing
situation and asked urgently for a business recovery plan to restore
delivery of customer service targets within six months. This was
submitted on 29 March and approved by Mr O'Brien and the Home
Secretary on 31 March. It forecast restoring turn around times
of 15 days by June.
The plan included provision of some 300 extra staff and the
Agency expected that this increase together with the normal dip
in demand between Easter and the late May Bank Holiday, and high
staff availability at that time of year, would enable them to
recover lost ground and contain the problem to manageable proportions.
At the end of the financial year 1998-99 the total amount of unprocessed
work was some 75,000 cases higher than in 1997-98 and was still
not judged to be critical.
However, intake of applications did not dip as expected but
instead rose significantly. By late April there were serious concerns
at the increasing arrears and the rising level of enquiries which
were swamping the telephone enquiry system. The reasons for this
shift in the pattern of demand are being investigated but on current
information appear to have been caused by a mix of demand being
brought forward, as people hearing of delays sent in applications
earlier than usual, and higher than forecast demand for separate
passports for children.
The Agency response was to introduce greater use of free
two year extensions from early May. This proved insufficient in
the face of escalating demand as public concern and media coverage
of growing delays increased and figures for intake and output
in the first two weeks of June showed that the position was deteriorating
rapidly. Further measures were introduced, including 100 additional
staff, the facility exceptionally to extend passports at some
1,700 main Post Offices, and a national telephone helpline to
deal with enquiries from customers with urgent travel needs. Work
is prioritised to meet travel dates and extensive weekend and
evening work has helped to reduce the arrears. The number of applications
outstanding has fallen from over 550,000 in early June to less
than 420,000 at 19 Julythe equivalent of some three weeks
work.
I should also like to provide further information to the
Committee to supplement the information I gave at the hearing
on 6 July:
FURTHER INFORMATION
ON LONG-TERM
FIRE TRENDS
(Q12)
The target to reduce by 20 per cent the number of accidental
fire-related deaths in the home is from an average of 380 a year
in England and Wales to an average of 304 a year by March 2003.
The target to reduce the number of fires to a level lower
than currently projected in long-term trends is against projected
trends for numbers of fires of 608,100 (high rainfall) to 633,500
(low rainfall) in the UK in the year ending March 2002.
IND'S LATEST
OUTPUT FIGURES
(Q56)
The following table reflects the latest available casework
output figures.
| April 1999 | May 1999
|
| Nationality | 4,910 | 5,080
|
| After-entry | 17,000 | 17,200
|
| Asylum Decisions | 3,040* |
3,220* |
| | |
*recent asylum output figures include significant numbers
of applications from Kosovars, which were processed as part of
a special exercise.
The following table shows the number of Kosovan Asylum cases
decided in 1999:
| January | 40 |
| February | 50 |
| March | 80 |
| April | 980 |
| May | 1,680 |
| |
PROGRESS WITH
CASES TO
ADJUDICATORS (QQ71-74)
An Appeals Support Section (ASS) was established in early
April to prepare asylum appeals bundles and the number of cases
now being sent to IAA continues to increase. In week ending 3
July, 269 appeals were forwarded, representing 107 per cent of
the agreed 1998 weekly average. This was an increase of 7 per
cent compared with the previous week. The backlog of asylum appeals
has now fallen from 1,150 at the beginning of June to 942 at 3
July.
David Omand
20 July 1999
21
* Not printed. Back
|