Conclusions
94. Aviation in the United Kingdom has an excellent
safety record, one which does not appear to have been diminished
by deregulation. That is not to say that threats to safety standards
do not exist. Deregulation has introduced a number of changes
to the industry, not least considerable growth, with which the
regulatory regime operated by the Safety Regulation Group must
keep track. The Group must also deal with the constraints imposed
by its membership of JAA, and soon the EASA. To do its job thoroughly
it must be properly resourced, and we look to Government to ensure
that it is. There are on-going difficulties within National Air
Traffic Services, and we were particularly concerned by reports
of increased numbers of overloads of air traffic controllers.
The aviation industry, as well as the General Aviation sector,
faces a number of challenges, such as the projected shortage of
pilots, and of aircraft maintenance engineers, which threaten
safety standards. Furthermore, recent major accidents, such as
TWA 800, and the Swissair crash, as well as the rudder problem
on the Boeing 737, remain largely unsolved.
95. In these circumstances we were surprised by the
attitude of a number of the witnesses to our inquiry, particularly
the airlines and their representatives. Some seemed extraordinarily
complacent about safety in the British aviation industry, and
were content only to emphasise the industry's past record. That
attitude is flawed. It is not acceptable to wait until the safety
standards of aviation decline before changes are made: instead
all involved should constantly try to deal with potential problems
before safety standards are put at risk.
96. Boeing told us that "the United Kingdom
is one of the safest countries in the world [in terms of aviation
safety] and it is safe because you have developed an extremely
good working together atmosphere in this country, working together
between the regulatory authorities, the airlines, the manufacturers,
the pilots' unions, the flight attendants, the mechanics, everybody".[253]
We commend all involved for their spirit of co-operation, but
we detected signs in the evidence given to us that co-operation
might lead to cosiness. Most of our witnesses seemed unable or
unwilling to criticise others in the aviation sphere, other than
in the most general terms. All involved in aviation should
remember that openness and criticism aid safety, and that the
maintenance of safety standards is the most important factor in
building a successful aviation industry. We recommend that the
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions maintain
a careful eye on the relationship between the Safety Regulation
Group and the industry it regulates, and act firmly to ensure
that the Regulation Group remains independent and critical of
the industry. As we have said, splitting the Safety Regulation
Group from the Economic Regulation Group, through the creation
of an independent Transport Safety Authority, would help to ensure
that the safety regulator maintained an appropriate distance from
the industry.
97. Safety cannot be addressed in a vacuum. Some
of the difficulties we have discussed in this Report, such as
the shortage of pilots and aircraft maintenance engineers, are
not simple matters which can be resolved by the Safety Regulation
Group alone. Above all, the dramatic growth of the aviation industry
in recent years, partly as a result of deregulation, has resulted
in greater overcrowding in the airspace of the southeast of England,
and at the airports in that area. There are strong arguments on
safety grounds in favour of increasing runway capacity. Such matters
can only be dealt with in the context of an overall aviation policy,
and we look forward to the publication of the Government's aviation
daughter document.
253 Q.582. Back
|