APPENDIX 38
Memorandum submitted by the Royal Archaeological
Institute
1. The Charter of the Royal Archaeological
Institute states that the purpose for which the Institute is established
is "To examine, preserve and illustrate the ancient monuments,
past history, manners, customs, arts and literature of Great Britain
and Northern Ireland and other countries . . ."
2. The following points are offered in the
name of the President and result from discussion among the Institute's
officers.
3. The Royal Archaeological Institute promotes
its cause by making small grants for research amounting to up
to £20,000 per annum. Its application form is clear and brief.
It believes the current application procedures to the Heritage
Lottery Fund are unduly complicated. Even expert applicants wilt
under their complexities and the expense of completing an application
fully. In desperation some applicants turn to professional fund-raisers.
If the Fund wishes to encourage ordinary citizens to apply, the
application procedure should be simplified and clarified.
4. The Institute wishes to see Heritage
Lottery Funds used to encourage archaeological and architectural
projects which would improve the understanding, preservation and
illustration of ancient monuments and historic buildings in the
widest sense. The "pound for pound" rule in this context
is daunting to those individuals and small societies responsible
for such projects. It would help them were HLF grants to be made
to cover either specific parts of a project fully or to be on
a sliding scale, thereby to ease the finding of smaller grants
from other sources.
5. The need to provide a Conservation Plan
as part of an application for funding for a project can put a
severe burden on those responsible. Might it be feasible for funding
to be arranged in two distict stages? Initial funds might then
go towards a pilot stage, and fuller and greater funding become
applicable when a successful pilot has eased the problem of providing
a Conservation Plan?
6. In general funding should be primarily
devoted to projects which are specifically aimed at improving
the general viability of monuments or buildings, rather than to
projects specifically aimed at enhancing their money-making capabilities.
August 1998
|