APPENDIX 18
Memorandum submitted by the Northern Ireland
Museums Council
Thank you for your invitation to submit written
evidence to this inquiry. The Heritage Lottery Fund is now a major
player in the museums scene in Northern Ireland and this Council
is pleased to be associated with its work.
The Northern Ireland Museums Council was established
in 1993 after widespread consultation with museums, district councils
and public bodies in Northern Ireland. It is the most recently
established of the 10 area museums councils (AMCs) the first of
which was established in England in the 1950s.
NIMC was established by the Minister for Education
in Northern Ireland and constituted as a non-departmental public
body. It has an elected Chairman and a Board of 14 which represents
district councils, regional museums, education bodies and other
organisations. It is also a membership organisation with a current
membership of almost 60 bodies.
The mission of NIMC is to support museums in
Northern Ireland in maintaining and improving their standards
of collections care and service to the pubic and, to promote a
coherent framework of museum provision. To this end the Council
provides advice, training and grant-aid. NIMC also pro-actively
promotes the development of a coherent framework of museum and
related provision in the Province.
Museums are very important within the cultural
life of Northern Ireland. They contain the evidence for our identities
as both people of Irish and British origin. They are a major resource
for education and leisure and are playing an increasingly important
role in both tourism and the attraction of inward investment.
The museum sector is, however, substantially under-developed and
I will refer to this below.
The role of your organisation and its relationship
to the Heritage Lottery Fund, including, if applicable, separate
information on the role of the organisation as an applicant for
funds as opposed to an advisory body
HLF designated the Northern Ireland Museums
Council as a statutory advisor together with the Department of
the Environment in Northern Ireland. NIMC provides HLF with formal
assessments of museum applications from Northern Ireland. This
work is undertaken on a fee-paying basis. In preparing this advice
NIMC consults closely with applicants and analyses all the relevant
paperwork. The involvement of NIMC in the assessment process has
major benefits for museums and heritage in Northern Ireland. Firstly
the Council can identify if an application complies with UK standards
of collections care and service to the public. Secondly, with
its detailed local knowledge, the Council may comment as to whether
the application fits within agreed museum strategies, policies
and priorities for Northern Ireland. Lastly the Councils detailed
knowledge of the operation and finances of our museums allows
it to flag-up over optimistic visitor and revenue projections
and to recommend accordingly.
Draft advice prepared by the Director is circulated
to the Chairman and three other Board members which the Chairman
selects. In order to avoid any potential conflict of interest
the Chairman selects different Board members for each application
whose museums or interests are not in competition with an applicant.
As a government sponsored body the Council is required on many
occasions to provide impartial and objective advice to public
bodies, government and its agencies. This is independent advice
which takes into account agreed strategies, policies and priorities
for museums in Northern Ireland.This approach, together with the
use of a Board panel ensures that the partisan view of an applicant,
who may or may not be a member of NIMC, are not given undue or
inappropriate weight.
This Council has not yet made application to
HLF for funds for its own work. Under the new powers which HLF
recently acquired, there may well be occasion in future when NIMC
may make applications. Such applications would in the first instance
have to serve the need of the museums sector in Northern Ireland
and could not therefore substitute or duplicate other applications.
We would anticipate that the same rigorous assessment currently
applied to applicants would also be applied to NIMC and that our
role as a statutory advisor (which is primarily a business relationship)
would not militate in our favour. We would of course anticipate
independent assessment of our applications.
The distribution of funds by the Heritage Lottery
Fund, its criteria for considering applications and its procedures
The recent date of establishment of NIMC is
a reflection on the underdeveloped state of the museum sector
in Northern Ireland. There are therefore fewer potential applicants
from Northern Ireland than from other parts of the UK. In this
context the take-up of funding in Northern Ireland is below most
other parts of the country. HLF have endeavoured to counteract
this position with regular visits to the Province to publicise
the funds. They are shortly to establish an office in Belfast
which we welcome. We would be concerned, however, that this increased
and welcome regionalisation could be seen as an alternative source
of advice on applications from the Province.
We have also noticed in recent times an increased
tendency on the part of HLF to take less and less detailed advice
from bodies such as NIMC. This is deeply regrettable as there
can be no substitute for properly informed advice, delivered from
the local perspective which takes account of existing and changing
strategies, policies and priorities. The breadth of HLF's remit
is such that it cannot hold in-house expertise of sufficient depth
and number across all the areas of its remit. We see an important
and continuing role by outside advisory bodies such as NIMC. A
reduction of such advice is not advisable and could lead to support
for ill-advised and inappropriate applications.
The welcome establishment of the new "country
committees" of HLF (which will deal with applications of
£500,000 or less) must also be seen as an important additional
source of comment and advice but one which cannot either substitute
for the detailed professional advice which can be provided by
experts in the field. Again the wide remit of this committee (reflecting
that of HLF itself) will not place it in a position to provide
fully informed assessments or comment. There has been much pressure
on HLF to regionalise its procedures since, unlike the arts, sports
and charities in Northern Ireland, the heritage lottery is centralised
in London for all of UK. The country committees must not be seen
as equivalent in any way to the existing arts, sports and charity
lottery funds within Northern Ireland which have full lottery
assessment procedures and officers at their disposal.
The impact of the Heritage Lottery Fund on the
heritage sector with which our organisation is concerned
The impact of HLF funding has been extremely
positive in Northern Ireland where previous museum capital funding
was only available through economically and tourism driven funding.
HLF is the first major capital resource whose primary function
is to support the care and use of heritage assets. This is a long
overdue recognition of the importance of heritage to the fabric
of life and, in the Northern Ireland context, it is much needed
indeed.
Only 27 per cent of district councils in Northern
Ireland currently provide Registered museum services. This can
be compared to approximately 75 per cent in Scotland. Only 15
of our 26 district councils are committed at the moment to providing
any form of museum service. The museum infrastructure in Northern
Ireland is substantially underdeveloped in relation to any other
part of the United Kingdom. The Heritage Lottery Fund is the only
potential source of capital funding available to develop the museum
infrastructure here to a normal and sustainable level. This gap
in provision in the regional museum sector means:
That large sections of the Northern
Ireland population do not have access to a museum service of an
appropriate quality;
That the neglect of local heritage
and identity continues in large measure;
That the exploration through museums
and their collections of local culture and identity is not open
to many communities.
While therefore welcoming the new wider powers
which flow to HLF from the National Heritage Act 1997 this Council
has cautioned on the need to continue providing adequate capital
funding for infrastructural development in Northern Ireland. As
stated above, one of the reasons for the low take-up in Northern
Ireland has derived from the absence of sufficient applicants
on the ground. NIMC has developed a stratetgy for the expansion
of regional museums in the Province which is sustainable and widely
supported. Developed in consultation with district councils and
other agencies, the NIMC strategy proposes the development of
a selected number of strategically located regional museums which
are operated as partnerships by groups of district councils. We
have brokered such partnerships in two parts of the Province already
and are pro-actively discussing such developments elsewhere. The
key to the success of these partnerships will lie in two areastheir
management structure and sustainable revenue commitments and more
importantly in this context, the potential for accessing HLF funding
for the construction/extension etc of museums.
The NIMC strategy for the development of regional
museums is both government endorsed and has been verbally and
publicly supported by HLF. Nevertheless, it is widely accepted
that Great Britain has sufficient museums and that new museum
developments will be rare. This is not the situation in Northern
Ireland and we have corresponded with HLF and sought reassurance
that our regional needs will be taken into account.
Any proposals or recommendations relating to the
future work of the Heritage Lottery Fund
The varying needs of the different countries
and regions of the UK require formal recognition by HLF. Consideration
should be given to ring-fencing capital funding for Northern Ireland
in recognition of its under-developed museum infrastructure. We
are also aware at NIMC that the National Museums and Galleries
of Northern Ireland require considerable extension and expansion.
This Museum, recently formed by the merger of three other centrally
funded museums, is also concerned that the new HLF powers will
greatly reduce its potential to fund much needed expansion. NIMC
does not act on behalf of the National Museum and we are not therefore
in a position to go into detail in this letter.
NIMC would be content to provide a representative
to give oral evidence if required.
June 1998
|