Select Committee on Agriculture Fifth Report


APPENDIX 12

Memorandum submitted by Mr D R Hastings (L14)

  As a working herdsman and a keen supporter of badgers I would like to raise the following points, on the husbandry side of this controversial issue:

PASSPORTS

  With the recent BSE problems the movement of cattle in this country has been greatly increased with replacements needed for dairy herds and beef cattle having a quicker turnround, therefore the risk of cow to cow transmission is greater, not only within herds but due to contact over boundaries and at markets, also any herd hiring or buying in a bull is at a much higher risk, and it is quite possible under the present system for an animal to go its whole life without being tested. With an infected animal passing it on, and being slaughtered without having been identified as a reactor. Thus hiding the actual source of the breakdown in that herd, and any other which has had contact with it.

  Passports have been introduced to aid the traceability of animals, but it is still not possible when buying in cattle to tell whether an animal has been TB tested and when, surely it makes sense to have this information logged on passports. Whilst it is a very rare occurrence for an animal to pick up the disease from a badger as I understand its lifespan outside the animal is fairly short, once one cow has it, then cow to cow transmission seems the most likely way for a large number of cows in a herd to be affected, the sooner the disease is diagnosed the better as this would stop a small problem from escalating. Although MAFF may be able to cross reference the computer databases on TB tests, this is of little help to the farmer on purchasing cattle. When a farm has had a clear test, a sheet of stamps could be issued from the British Cattle Movement Services records, each stamp with the identity number of an animal tested that has a passport. These stamps could then be placed on a dedicated page in the passport by the farmer giving an instant record of when and if an animal was tested.

  The belief that this would prejudice the sale of stock from a farm which has had an outbreak, is not valid. If a test showed a reactor, this would not show in the passport, but no stamps would be issued until the herd was clear and no animals would be allowed to to be moved off the holding until after a clear test—as is the case now!

TESTING

  Prompt and easy testing for the disease, to reduce spread within a herd, between herds and between species, thus reducing the cost of outbreaks.

  To this end in the dairy industry, testing of the bulk milk seems the obvious method.

  Enclosed is a copy of an article published in the Times from Dr Colin Fink and his reply to this method of testing. [not printed]

HUSBANDRY

    —  Cattle should be excluded from water courses.

    —  Grassland close to badger setts should be used for conservation in the spring when m.bovis can survive for the longest period outside of a host animal.

    —  Boundary fences between farms should be well maintained and definitely not allow physical contact between animals.

    —  Use of shared manure spreaders may also aid in the spread of the disease.

OTHER

    —  Farmers should be educated to the benefits of having clean badgers on their land as these will discourage vagrant animals moving in.

10 January 1998


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1999
Prepared 27 April 1999