United Kingdom Parliament
Publications & records
Advanced search
 HansardArchivesResearchHOC PublicationsHOL PublicationsCommittees
Select Committee on Standards and Privileges Eighteenth Report


APPENDIX 1

Memorandum submitted by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards

Complaints against Mr Geoffrey Robinson

1.    Mr David Heathcoat-Amory wrote to me on 19 February 1998 alleging that Mr Geoffrey Robinson had a remunerated directorship from 1984 which he failed to declare in the Register of Members' Interests until 1987. In support of his allegation, he supplied extracts from the accounts of Swiss EDM Ltd and, from 1986, of Agie UK Ltd to which the company had, by then, changed its name. Mr Heathcoat-Amory's letter is at Annex A.

2.     Further to that complaint, Mr Peter Lilley wrote to me on 27 February 1998 alleging that the accounts of Agie UK Ltd listed a number of other directorships held by Mr Robinson, several of which had direct links with the late Robert Maxwell, which he had also failed to register. These were:
1988Hollis PLC
Central and Sheerwood PLC
1989Central and Sheerwood PLC
Hollis Industries PLC
Pergamon AGB PLC
1990Central and Sheerwood PLC
Hollis Industries PLC
Holcombe Holdings PLC

Mr Lilley's letter is at Annex B.

3.    Mr Robinson provided me with comments on these allegations, together with a schedule of directorships prepared by his accountants, Wilder Coe, in his letter of 3 March (Annex C). This indicated that he had been remunerated by Swiss EDM/Agie UK Ltd, Transfer Technology Ltd/TransTec, Central and Sheerwood and the Kleinwort Smaller Companies Investment Trust.

4.    Mr Robinson acknowledged that his chairmanship of Swiss EDM/Agie UK Ltd should have been registered in 1983. When he became aware of the omission in 1987, he corrected it. He thought his registration entries were accurate in all other respects.

5.    Although the schedule from Wilder Coe went wider than the subject of the two complaints, it suggested that there may have been a similar delay in registering a remunerated directorship with Transfer Technology Ltd/TransTec. I therefore sought Mr Robinson's comments on this in a letter dated 4 March.

6.    Since the analysis from Wilder Coe could not necessarily be seen as direct evidence, I also obtained records from Companies House relating to all the companies mentioned. These raised a number of questions concerning, in particular, Pergamon (formerly Hollis PLC); Central and Sheerwood PLC; and Hollis Industries PLC. The latter was also drawn to my attention in a further letter from Mr Heathcoat-Amory dated 13 May (Annex D). In some of these cases Mr Robinson was a director, not the chairman, and his remuneration (if any) was not shown separately in the accounts.

7.    In response to my inquiries Mr Robinson told me in early March that some of the companies involved were in liquidation and that he would only be able to supply me with a full response once his advisers had identified relevant documents in the hands of the liquidators. He subsequently told me that this was proving more difficult than expected.

8.    During this period I reported the position regularly to the Committee who were anxious to have a full response from Mr Robinson so that the allegations might be examined in proper context. However, at their meeting on 2 June, the Committee concluded that the matter should no longer be postponed. The Committee therefore asked me to produce a report on those matters which could be settled relatively quickly. In practice, I am now able to provide substantive comments on all the allegations. Since these are all matters of registration, Mr Robinson's entries in the published Registers from 1982 onwards are shown at Annex E.

SWISS EDM /AGIE UK LTD

9.    Mr Robinson has confirmed that he was the paid chairman of this company between 1984 and 1988. The published accounts indicate that the Chairman's remuneration, excluding pension contributions, was at the following levels.
1984£25,800
1985£50,750
1986£16,811
1987£17,269
1988£21,206

10.  Under the rules of the House, paid directorships have been registrable since 1974. In his letter to me of 3 March Mr Robinson acknowledged that, although his period as non-executive chairman of this company was a matter of public record, he should have registered his interest when he first took up the appointment in 1983; his failure to do so was due to an administrative error for which he apologised but when he became aware of the omission in 1987, he had corrected it.

11.  Mr Robinson first informed the then Registrar of his interest in a letter dated 23 March 1987 (Annex F). That letter did not indicate that this was a delayed registration.

TRANSFER TECHNOLOGY LTD/TRANSTEC

12.  In his letter to me of 3 March Mr Robinson expressed the belief that his registrations had been accurate in all other respects. However, the schedule accompanying his letter suggested that there may have been a similar delay in registering his remunerated directorship with Transfer Technology Ltd/TransTec. Although this company did not feature in the original complaints I took the view that the Committee would expect me to seek an explanation.

13.  Mr Robinson was paid chairman of the company from 1987/88 to 1996/97. The published accounts indicate that the chairman's remuneration, excluding pension contributions, in the early years was as follows:
1987£ 2,675
1988£32,100
1989£32,000
1990£42,000

Mr Robinson's directorship in the company was first registered in early 1991, although he had registered his shareholding in the company since 1982.

14.  Mr Robinson has explained the apparent delay in registering his directorship in his letter to me of 18 June, with which he enclosed his own annotated copy of his exchange with the then Registrar (Annex G). He maintains that, having mentioned his directorship to the Registrar in February 1989, it was agreed in discussion that an entry was not required at that time. His reason for this was that although remuneration, after deduction of tax and National Insurance, was credited to him for the period from 1987 to 1990, it was not paid but was loaned back to the company, which he virtually owned.

15.  I have discussed the matter with the then Registrar. At this distance it would be unfair to place too much weight on memory. He suspects, however, that he understood at the time that since no payment had been received, the position was therefore unremunerated. Had he appreciated that the position was remunerated, but that the remuneration had been re-lent to the company, he would have advised registration. This is also my view and that of the present Registrar.

HOLLIS INDUSTRIES PLC

16.  Mr Robinson has confirmed that he was Chairman of Hollis Industries PLC, a subsidiary of Pergamon Group PLC, during the 18 month period of the accounts ended 30 June 1990. Mr Lilley and Mr Heathcoat-Amory allege that this was a directorship which should have been registered and they supported their allegation by reference to the published accounts which provided for Chairman's emoluments of £200,000.

17.  The relevant extracts from the published accounts are at Annex H. Pages 1-3 are the Directors' Report showing that Mr Robinson was the Chairman and that the accounts were signed by the Secretary on behalf of the Board. Page 4 is the opinion of the Auditors, Coopers and Lybrand Deloitte. Page 14 shows the provision for the Chairman's emoluments.

18.  Mr Robinson has repeatedly told me that he did not, in fact, receive payment for this position and the delay in reaching a conclusion on this matter has been occasioned by the need to allow him the opportunity of assembling evidence to support this contention.

19.  He has now supplied me with

    —   a copy of a letter of 10 June from Coopers and Lybrand, together with an annotated Inter-Office Memorandum from their audit papers

    —   a letter of 12 June from Mr Michael Stoney, a former non-executive Director of Hollis Industries at the time.

These papers are at Annex I.

20.  From these papers, the case against the allegations can be summarised as follows:

    (i)  Mr Robinson has denied receiving payment and is prepared to have his personal bank statements examined to show that no payment passed into his accounts.

    (ii)  The accounts of the company were qualified at the time by the auditors on the grounds that, until January 1990, the accounting records were not sufficient to enable them fully to verify the profit and loss account and the statement of source and application of funds.

    (iii)  Coopers and Lybrand have confirmed that they were informed (probably in late November 1990) that the remuneration had not been paid; and they had no other evidence from which they could now determine whether or not a payment was made subsequently.

    (iv)  Mr Stoney was the non-executive Director of the company who requested the then Financial Controller of Hollis to make provision in the accounts for a £200,000 management fee, payable to the Chairman. At Mr Robinson's request, Mr Stoney has examined the files held by Arthur Andersen, the administrators. He found no trace of any remuneration having been made to Mr Robinson and concluded "I am satisfied that you never received the £200,000 from Hollis Industries PLC, despite the entry in the account".

    (v)  This also accords with the analysis produced by Mr Robinson's accountants, Wilder Coe (Annex C).

OTHER COMPANIES

21.  Mr Lilley's letter of 27 February referred to four other companies:

    —   Hollis PLC

    —   Central and Sheerwood PLC

    —   Pergamon AGB PLC

    —   Holcombe Holdings PLC

From the published accounts the position on these seems to be as follows:

HOLLIS PLC

22.  Mr Robinson was appointed a director on 22 April 1988 and resigned on 2 March 1990. The company changed its name to Pergamon Professional and Financial Services PLC in July 1988 and to Pergamon AGB PLC in October 1988.

23.  The accounts for 1988 show 21 Directors and this number is accounted for under the section on 'Directors Emoluments'. However, 10 of the Directors are shown in the bracket £0-£5000 and Mr Robinson has told me that he was unpaid. I have no reason to doubt it.

CENTRAL AND SHEERWOOD PLC

24.  Mr Robinson was appointed a Director on 29 July 1987 and resigned on 6 May 1997. The company changed its name to TransTec PLC in May 1991.

25.  The accounts for 1988, 1989 and 1990 show, variously, six or seven directors. With one or two exceptions they were listed under remuneration in the bracket £0-£5000. Mr Robinson tells me he was unpaid and I have no reason to doubt it. He did, in fact, receive a one-off consultancy fee from the company in 1991 and this was properly declared in the update to the Register.

PERGAMON AGB PLC

26.  This was the same company as Hollis PLC (see paragraphs 22-23 above).

HOLCOMBE HOLDINGS PLC

27.  This company was part of the Central and Sheerwood Group. Mr Robinson was the Chairman in 1989 and 1990 but the accounts indicate that it was an unpaid position.

CONCLUSIONS

28.  My conclusions are as follows:

    (i)  Mr Heathcoat-Amory's allegation that Mr Robinson failed to register a paid directorship in Swiss EDM/Agie UK Ltd between 1984 and 1987 should be upheld. Mr Robinson has apologised for this omission which he attributed to an administrative error. He corrected the error in 1987.

    (ii)  It has emerged during this inquiry that Mr Robinson also omitted to register a directorship in Transfer Technology Ltd/TransTec between 1987 and 1990. Mr Robinson believed he had the agreement of the then Registrar to this action, since the remuneration was not drawn from the company. However, I believe this was a misunderstanding. In my view there were effectively two transactions - receipt of remuneration and lending it back to his own company, presumably with some expectation of repayment. In my view, this remained an interest as Director which should have been registered. It is, however, fair to point out that Mr Robinson did not conceal his interest - having registered his shareholding in the company since 1982.

    (iii)  In the case of Hollis Industries PLC, an apparently straightforward transaction turned out to be nothing of the kind. Although there can be no certainty on this matter, on the evidence I have seen I think the likelihood is that Mr Robinson did not receive payment of £200,000 and that the published accounts are in error. Certainly there is insufficient evidence on which to reach a contrary decision.

    (iv)  I have seen no evidence to suggest that Mr Robinson failed to register paid directorships in

    —   Hollis PLC

    —   Central and Sheerwood

    —   Pergamon AGB PLC

    —   Holcombe Holdings PLC.

22 June 1998





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 15 July 1998