United Kingdom Parliament
Publications & records
Advanced search
 HansardArchivesResearchHOC PublicationsHOL PublicationsCommittees
Previous Section Index Home Page


Foreign Students

Mr. Opik: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment if he will estimate the gross cost of setting up mechanisms for the means testing of citizens of other EU member states to assess their eligibility to pay tuition fees. [27718]

Dr. Howells: I refer the hon. Member to the reply given to the hon. Member for Havant (Mr. Willetts) on 27 January 1998, Official Report, column 191.

NVQ Provision

Mr. Willis: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what plans he has to monitor the quality of NVQ provision in the workplace. [27709]

Dr. Howells: The quality assurance of NVQs is primarily a matter for the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority and the awarding bodies. The Department is currently providing £1.5 million to support additional external verification of NVQs by awarding bodies to help in assuring standards of assessment. In addition the delivery of training funded through Colleges and TECs, which includes NVQ provision in the workplace, is inspected by the Further Education Funding Council and the Training Standards Council.

New School (Portsmouth)

Mr. Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what assessment he has made of Portsmouth City Council's proposals to build a school on the site of the East wing of St. Mary's Hospital in respect of the adequacy of the site for a school of the size proposed. [27885]

Mr. Byers: I can confirm that Portsmouth City Council has put forward a public-private partnership proposal to provide a new secondary school. I understand that the Council is still considering a number of possible sites for the school. As part of the new process for assessing the viability of local authority PPP/PFI projects, the Council's proposal is currently being considered by the interdepartmental Project Review Group. An announcement about approved projects is expected shortly.

12 Feb 1998 : Column: 285

Education Budgets

Mr. Don Foster: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what was the difference between the education budget and the general schools budget for each local education authority in the country; and how much of that amount was spent on service strategy and regulation activity in the last year for which figures are available. [27500]

Mr. Byers: The following table sets out, for each local education authority in England, the difference between its total education budget and its General Schools Budget, and its Service Strategy and Regulation expenditure for 1996-97.

£000

1996-97 LEADifference between total education budget and General Schools Budget Net current expenditure on Service Strategy and Regulation
Barking and Dagenham6,7831,450
Barnet40,7691,855
Barnsley4,6001,589
Bedfordshire41,3661,156
Berkshire58,0351,726
Bexley 17,3741,659
Birmingham74,431639
Bolton12,204595
Bradford23,023259
Brent45,749388
Bromley58,0061,085
Buckinghamshire59,3953,573
Bury4,4011,013
Calderdale28,932669
Cambridgeshire61,0182,119
Camden17,5571,028
Cheshire31,8191,529
Cornwall10,6891,347
Corporation of London2,063295
Coventry11,8991,020
Croydon40,5671,573
Cumbria50,2681,286
Derbyshire70,6511,748
Devon35,9001,766
Doncaster4,895223
Dorset48,7661,318
Dudley21,9241,643
Durham17,548806
Ealing31,416962
East Sussex16,7442,523
Enfield27,7302,048
Essex256,3256,405
Gateshead7,197463
Gloucestershire80,8451,251
Greenwich13,2941,238
Hackney18,0691,122
Hammersmith and Fulham16,8411,975
Hampshire77,3452,877
Haringey8,454602
Harrow10,5961,093
Havering16,282730
Hereford and Worcester28,6491,314
Hertfordshire88,4233,341
Hillingdon44,809302
Hounslow9,875850
Hull10,871463
Isle of Wight5,171579
Isles of Scilly25321
Islington15,595692
Kensington and Chelsea16,7791,412
Kent204,9301,688
Kirklees15,979627
Knowsley7,1862,918
Lambeth46,551750
Lancashire56,0521,962
Leeds26,012667
Leicestershire25,1091,101
Lewisham18,7752,027
Lincolnshire82,0981,527
Liverpool35,0902,277
Manchester16,2811,474
Merton5,7241,531
Newcastle17,4872,779
Newham14,9181,346
Norfolk47,394886
North Tyneside4,214578
Northamptonshire44,6661,597
Northumberland6,4471,223
Nottinghamshire34,3672,351
Oldham3,756515
Oxfordshire18,1671,035
Redbridge11,3451,105
Richmond4,732810
Rochdale16,566587
Rotherham6,016315
Salford7,781682
Sandwell14,383879
Sefton5,467436
Sheffield12,710827
Shropshire20,853873
Solihull3,6581,621
Somerset17,014582
South Tyneside5,75682
Southwark29,274675
St. Helens5,048803
Staffordshire37,8081,600
Stockport4,867373
Suffolk13,1961,988
Sunderland6,841264
Surrey72,8453,062
Sutton25,962758
Tameside12,144664
Tower Hamlets23,1071,892
Trafford19,592700
Wakefield4,593582
Walsall28,1501,664
Waltham Forest17,0792,384
Wandsworth28,4681,316
Warwickshire20,6731,662
West Sussex15,3101,346
Westminster17,8692,240
Wigan725568
Wiltshire56,8291,046
Wirral15,3201,535
Wolverhampton16,1511,333

12 Feb 1998 : Column: 286

Welfare to Work

Miss McIntosh: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment if he will make a statement on the contractual arrangement for the delivery of the New Deal services to provide Welfare to Work. [27687]

Mr. Alan Howarth: Responsibility for the subject of the question has been delegated to the Employment Service agency under its Chief Executive. I have asked him to arrange for a reply to be given.

12 Feb 1998 : Column: 287

Letter from Leigh Lewis to Miss Anne McIntosh, dated February 1998:







New Deal (Child Minders)

Mr. Willetts: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what estimate he has made of the cost of training 50,000 child-minders under the New Deal; which organisations will be expected to carry out such training; and how many participants are expected to be (a) young people unemployed for more than six months, (b) single parents and (c) others. [27712]

Mr. Andrew Smith: I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave him on 28 January 1998, Official Report, column 237, on the number of young people likely to train as childcare workers under the New Deal for 18-24 year olds. Potentially, participants on the New Deal for long-term unemployed people could also train as childcare workers under these options, and participants on the New Deal for lone parents could be helped to find employment as a childcare worker.

There are different arrangements for training and funding young people to become childcare workers for each of the options for the New Deal for 18-24 year olds. On the Voluntary Sector (VS) and Employment options young people will be provided with work experience by voluntary childcare organisations, and by private and local authority nurseries respectively, which will work with training organisations to enable participants to attend an approved childcare course for at least the equivalent of a day per week. On the Full Time Education and Training (FTET) option young people will attend approved childcare courses provided by training organisations. In addition to the allowances that will be payable to participants on the FTET and VS options, voluntary organisations will be paid a placement fee for each participant in the VS option (the amount depending on contract), employers will receive a job subsidy of £60 per week per participant under the Employment option, and training organisations will receive a fee which is negotiated locally under the FTET option. Organisations providing placements on the VS and Employment options, will also be paid £750 per participant for training. The overall cost will depend upon the level of take up on each of the options.

12 Feb 1998 : Column: 288


Next Section Index Home Page